Re: 10 a.m.

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Mon, 11 July 2016 16:05 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA21312D7E0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SQ_mny_E56AN for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C231B12D82F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:05:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id o67so31594533qke.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:05:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=xA8NnOxLhVC9CmjdZK5pcgsGCdH2KPNVKqG7rUOfEKA=; b=JsbebSfjUyjDvXKWhBEJsiHLue2BkxSQzYSwWIqd16SlPeHrKCgLxJ0uTeJn2yd0Og eQ4mnhdJlbzQ/kh/Hhzqorma1qmcJFrMUDVZFFggUytllbKrhNLB1lDKCe381cYD/kj0 itqUtP5z2Knl7TkN8NoPXToRK7EeQWx95sCcxbxj5daHaulvvu8h5PKNxuUMojSuYGKv +eON9wEbS+QhirbFEDwukljBhfnNILBY4Xo179cPEm8V8jcv+OYooEEES70OtbKZoH2f VrnNZs5p4dQENIs8wYHFdpg/4M0cQVDVzFA4zkgJHQ72HQRcOOl3coWyGJg8EXRMBrAs SuAA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=xA8NnOxLhVC9CmjdZK5pcgsGCdH2KPNVKqG7rUOfEKA=; b=iJrVqrGTyydrDtPRxEYfl+iNRTqNVn6gfaT2CzBfyCn2/dAn5TU9LvHQ7q91892/sn I9GwORSA3GlmNM4B5FeIKWJtnAgfex4w7mQ1TXMg/dn75zung87DQBNaSa6G4WpfUdMO e4vwwo5uYrQvUvYFYvEAs7QTHtO9QhZ6gXP/CUatjuNTLJceqOYHqrzcotpVBKf5a6X5 CPHIyHChhgrauWlaeSTi0ffkwD1WVTQZ7JUo5zIxd0/C815ezsB6kA3z0EtDvDeayxpS Hj0QN8mgSnuze8ttBTBEYmYp8IbnCKP0C0904KwBWXIq8lLTdG4kWAFhnksfp3jIYgju 72GQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIoR6HNxx4YkhZ5SSyvnVlRS0kpq4W/Hq44H8WYZa7TC2+IL4rYTC8lOrkGzx7+pNOVKJnrNctgKhkdMg==
X-Received: by 10.55.73.148 with SMTP id w142mr26824930qka.77.1468253130868; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.200.57.81 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:05:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <c451aacc-5d0f-bb58-2904-37d9e7df0ad8@gmail.com>
References: <ffde10f3-3084-3267-04bd-e052d120bc01@gmail.com> <CAG4d1rcr3Yk4iR5Q0o9vyvR7COOY+qaW2C63TM-vkaXAkqYMvQ@mail.gmail.com> <c451aacc-5d0f-bb58-2904-37d9e7df0ad8@gmail.com>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:05:30 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rc5MRgA0YoE0D9W6tcjTcJErf3Qvmu6zrNNT02sJAntxw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 10 a.m.
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114a88084e514b05375e5240"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/j08ZKtjk2RFMQOLDzwL3GeVKfjA>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 16:05:35 -0000

Brian,

My point with the Paris meeting was that after IETF 63, folks really liked
not
having to come back to an evening session - and now we don't.

Personally, I'm up late anyway chatting - so getting an extra hour to sleep
was
quite nice.

Alia

On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Brian E Carpenter <
brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Alia, thanks for responding.
> On 12/07/2016 01:10, Alia Atlas wrote:
> > Brian,
> >
> > In Buenos Aires, the dinner times are substantially later and the
> schedule was
> > adjusted to accommodate local conditions.
>
> Yes, I did wonder about that (and I remember non-IETF meetings in Portugal
> and Spain where a similar schedule shift would have been appropriate)
>
> > There was a lot of positive feedback
> > about the later starting time.
>
> Beats me. As I said, from my PoV it is an hour wasted each day. (I
> understand
> that many people have breakfast meetings. I have at least three myself.
> But they're simply going to start an hour later; no win there.)
>
> > I'm sure you remember the Paris meeting where the IETF tried a different
> evening
> > schedule & it was very popular.
>
> Not sure which Paris meeting you're thinking of, but I do recall that
> for IETF 63 we completely rejigged the traditional schedule to move the
> meal breaks an hour later, but still starting at 9. That was designed to
> match restaurant serving hours in Paris. You can see that schedule at
> https://www.ietf.org/meeting/63/agenda-overview.html. iirc it worked
> reasonably well.
>
> > So, in response to the feedback and as an experiment, the starting time
> is later.
> > I believe Alexa included that this was an experiment in announcements.
>
> Yes, but as others have pointed out that was weeks after many people made
> their travel bookings. (Personally that isn't an issue.)
>
> Well, I'll give it a try ;-)
>
> Regards
>    Brian
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alia
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 8:56 AM, Brian E Carpenter <
> > brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Where do I find the discussion and subsequent rough consensus to switch
> the
> >> starting time of the IETF f2f meeting days to 10 a.m.?
> >>
> >> As far as I'm concerned that is a big mistake, wasting an hour every day
> >> and making it (even more) difficult to relax in the evenings.
> >>
> >> (If there is some local peculiarity in Buenos Aires and Berlin that
> makes
> >> this more practical, it would be interesting to know.)
> >>
> >> Regards
> >>    Brian
> >>
> >>
> >
>