Re: [perpass] [removed] metrics
SM <sm@resistor.net> Thu, 31 October 2013 15:48 UTC
Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B569011E8167 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.574
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.574 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8Nbgh1dY25sR for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:48:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7C511E8229 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:48:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r9VFmJkF025971; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1383234503; bh=VYVAFH0uO01hTjdOMV7RYAqCxtsc3/9/afrtzbMdVYM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=SHXOr05mkUlYOO06AaPJ9ATUeDILklb80gElIvhOpvKUmtJTK0JE8iZoDx+TudFF3 IsrH5+KY/KMxJpsP6Aitspt1EJi/h/dJn/7wrQeV4G5HVrcF/ZPkISwrYydnAVu8JG U9VdwyG7j+S9vdzQ/k/kE190+BpTIFTw4lydaWK8=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1383234503; i=@resistor.net; bh=VYVAFH0uO01hTjdOMV7RYAqCxtsc3/9/afrtzbMdVYM=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=nR7c1pg2wLkwI+e9zABbhNbgrLqqt+0nfKCNnSzyBsuLYFnuXNYWNS2Q5Z4MelvcY uegbxh7Y+P/2J5A+KvGcmIAV0JCBws1TdBxmUB34p4+MxPVubQ3gfsBWnj2SK/6VJO flqmmNZxQcyP/ZFv7JZ9UUtTFlTsPGk34ua1Bu0E=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20131031083431.0d161e18@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:47:58 -0700
To: ietf@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: [perpass] [removed] metrics
In-Reply-To: <526FC288.5060203@gmail.com>
References: <13102810494583_8A24@oregon.uoregon.edu> <526EB50D.70008@cs.tcd.ie> <526ECC25.3060106@comcast.net> <526ED0B2.1050006@cs.tcd.ie> <526FC288.5060203@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: rutkowski.tony@gmail.com
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 15:48:42 -0000
At 07:13 29-10-2013, Tony Rutkowski wrote: >The metrics below are useful in >analyzing the dynamics of the group. >It certainly gets a gold star for diversity. > >For those considering ID definitions, >the one below is available for use. > >[removed]: usually, a paranoid >person stroking their keyboard to send >message on perpass email list beating >up on NSA and offering some mitigating >scheme in an attempt to prevent traffic >analysis. The above is part of the message with msg-id: 526FC288.5060203@gmail.com. Somebody considered the message was offensive. I did not catch which part might be considered as offensive at first. I read the message again. In my humble opinion the word marked as [removed] in the above is highly unusual for an IETF mailing list. Regards, -sm