Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages

Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net> Wed, 13 July 2011 22:23 UTC

Return-Path: <dave@cridland.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B9611E8167 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WHWuXBG3ffGZ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from peirce.dave.cridland.net (peirce.dave.cridland.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:882:2e0:81ff:fe29:d16a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D2F11E809A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 15:23:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (peirce.dave.cridland.net [127.0.0.1]) by peirce.dave.cridland.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF941168087; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:23:00 +0100 (BST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at peirce.dave.cridland.net
Received: from peirce.dave.cridland.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (peirce.dave.cridland.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HLvZ1Ofgz1Cu; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:22:53 +0100 (BST)
Received: from puncture (puncture.dave.cridland.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f09:882:221:85ff:fe3f:1696]) by peirce.dave.cridland.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6514D1168067; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:22:53 +0100 (BST)
Subject: Re: Confidentiality notices on email messages
References: <CAC4RtVBGgk74VMEty9u5Yq+DFy=oR5tOnbZ3R5x83Gyee6mRNw@mail.gmail.com> <29987.1310565058@marajade.sandelman.ca> <4E1DCA13.9030301@acm.org> <04AE56F0C4CE8168D1B38D59@PST.JCK.COM>
In-Reply-To: <04AE56F0C4CE8168D1B38D59@PST.JCK.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <2018.1310595773.421047@puncture>
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 23:22:53 +0100
From: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>, IETF-Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; delsp="yes"; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 22:23:16 -0000

On Wed Jul 13 23:19:00 2011, John C Klensin wrote:
> 
> 
> --On Wednesday, July 13, 2011 09:38 -0700 Marc Petit-Huguenin
> <petithug@acm.org> wrote:
> 
> >...
> > Yes, and perhaps disclaimers/confidentiality notices should be
> > standardized with their own MIME type to make automatic
> > processing easier so receivers of this kind of notice
> > (mailing-list or other) can respect the wishes of the sender.
> >...
> 
> What did you have in mind?  Something like
> 
>   Content-type: text/legal-noise; charset=...

text/legal-noise+xml, obviously.

Only XML is sufficiently verbose for lawyers.

Dave.
-- 
Dave Cridland - mailto:dave@cridland.net - xmpp:dwd@dave.cridland.net
  - acap://acap.dave.cridland.net/byowner/user/dwd/bookmarks/
  - http://dave.cridland.net/
Infotrope Polymer - ACAP, IMAP, ESMTP, and Lemonade