Re: [mile] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mile-template-04.txt> (Guidelines for Defining Extensions to IODEF) to Informational RFC
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 17 May 2012 03:25 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787EC11E809F; Wed, 16 May 2012 20:25:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.554
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.554 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.045, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yi41x+TK7DaX; Wed, 16 May 2012 20:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (mailhost.stpeter.im [207.210.219.225]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2837111E809C; Wed, 16 May 2012 20:25:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.9] (unknown [216.17.175.160]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C63A24005A; Wed, 16 May 2012 21:41:15 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4FB46FA6.6060005@stpeter.im>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 21:25:26 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mile] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mile-template-04.txt> (Guidelines for Defining Extensions to IODEF) to Informational RFC
References: <20120516215321.9671.39664.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120516215321.9671.39664.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: mile@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 03:25:33 -0000
On 5/16/12 3:53 PM, The IESG wrote: > > The IESG has received a request from the Managed Incident Lightweight > Exchange WG (mile) to consider the following document: > - 'Guidelines for Defining Extensions to IODEF' > <draft-ietf-mile-template-04.txt> as Informational RFC Although this document does no harm, I have my doubts that the topic warrants publication of an RFC (and I say that as someone who is defining some IODEF extensions for use on the XMPP network [1]). Why would a simple wiki page [2] not suffice? If we decide than an RFC is needed, I have some more actionable feedback... 1. The document could be construed as assuming that IODEF extensions will all be defined in Internet-Drafts, that extension namespaces will be registered with IANA, and even that namespaces will be of the form 'urn:ietf:params:xml:schema:iodef-*'. It might be helpful to clarify the intended applicability of this document, i.e., merely as helpful suggestions for authors of Internet-Drafts, not truly as universally applicable guidelines for defining IODEF extensions. 2. Why is RFC 6545 a normative reference? 3. Given the many comments provided by Martin Dürst, mentioning his AppsDir review in the Acknowledgements seems appropriate. 4. Some of the text in the appendix seems needlessly detailed (e.g., saying that each extension needs to be specified in a subsection, or the recommendation to include a UML diagram). 5. Why is the list of datatypes in appendix A.4.1 copied from RFC 5070? A simple reference would do. (I almost said the same about the list in Section 3, but that one is marginally useful.) 6. Some of the information in this document repeats information from the RFC style guide and other sources; why? Peter [1] http://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0268.html [2] http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/mile/trac/wiki
- Re: [mile] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mile-template-0… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mile-template-04.txt> … SM
- Re: [mile] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mile-template-0… Brian Trammell
- Re: [mile] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mile-template-0… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [mile] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mile-template-0… Brian Trammell
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mile-template-04.txt> … Romascanu, Dan (Dan)