Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for last-call discussions

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Fri, 13 March 2020 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C893A0E2C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 09:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.079
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.079 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZGBFEoo0XM8z for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 09:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 515673A0128 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 09:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from unescapeable.local ([47.186.30.41]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 02DGOlWH033425 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 2020 11:24:48 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1584116688; bh=fAWYsNxJuOBF+5PR7/996pw4x3i6457NxBc4MabMCzw=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=YCPFVkJuyEQz78/VKnU8phG2e1opMTD0ME9myi0iLzCAkKzF9rG4PmoZ/YeUJGcF+ cl6hGrJ+8F2gRM/Y5Yl8cSACmRic9XqNhsEtuIyy2Umc6tuBjHI91dAB+1846RCVYf in0hACFtAu3uGpgsWm60qsBifvlPMuZZxJmRgRBk=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.30.41] claimed to be unescapeable.local
Subject: Re: Planned experiment: A new mailing list for last-call discussions
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <CALaySJKvdoy9MtzHMwq-Ew-EJoUs0V8t+y01FL-E5r3xdyRemQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sw=yoTSzD4XUKEEojspW8=Bsfv9QzDqRz5S0fHR0Cda9w@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.2003131210440.17044@bofh.nohats.ca>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <b4eaf545-16ac-d44f-34bf-8d3915773d51@nostrum.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 11:24:47 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2003131210440.17044@bofh.nohats.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/jDM21UjDAnQrXmbADjh4S7cUw2c>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 16:24:51 -0000

Paul -

Consider watching ietf-announce instead. LC announcements go there. The 
volume of other things announced there is low enough that you won't be 
as likely to miss LC announcements.

RjS

On 3/13/20 11:12 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2020, Rob Sayre wrote:
>
>> In my view, the experiment is a success.
>
> Yes, but it could use improvements.
>
> I would prefer a reply-to: the ietf@ietf.org list with the lastcall
> list not getting any further CC:s. This helps me see last call for new
> documents on this list without being drowned by a discussion on drafts
> that are not in my area of expertise. Currently, I think I miss some
> lastcall requests due to the high discussion volume on the list.
>
> Paul
>