IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)

David Conrad <david.conrad@nominum.com> Thu, 27 March 2003 01:41 UTC

Received: from ran.ietf.org (ran.ietf.org [10.27.6.60]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA26958; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 20:41:49 -0500 (EST)
Received: from majordomo by ran.ietf.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 18yMaH-0003xu-00 for ietf-list@ran.ietf.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 20:53:37 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([10.27.2.28] helo=ietf.org) by ran.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18yMZw-0003sy-00 for ietf@ran.ietf.org; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 20:53:16 -0500
Received: from shell.nominum.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA26873 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 20:38:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nominum.com (shell.nominum.com [128.177.192.160]) by shell.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5576F137F09; Wed, 26 Mar 2003 17:40:23 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 17:40:23 -0800
Subject: Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551)
Cc: Michel Py <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>, The IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
To: Ted Hardie <hardie@qualcomm.com>
From: David Conrad <david.conrad@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <DDC2EE76-5FEF-11D7-91E0-000393CB0816@qualcomm.com>
Message-Id: <139B47D4-5FF5-11D7-BCE2-000393DB42B2@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-ietf@ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Ted,

On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 05:03  PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
> 	If you were using some of an allocated portion as routable addresses
> and some as unrouted addresses, you might be forced to change the
> unrouted addresses as a consequences of choosing someone new to carry
> the traffic from the routed portions of your network.  That would carry
> the same pain of renumbering it always does.

Which, of course, implies NAT ("where's there's pain, there's NAT"? 
:-)).

Anyhow, this is the wrong list for this discussion...

Rgds,
-drc

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email