Re: Hotel situation

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Wed, 16 December 2015 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D4F1A1A39 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:56:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TjEQ8QWTLys3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:56:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22b.google.com (mail-pa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B3871A6F97 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:56:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id tl7so4851436pab.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:56:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=FeREoamhHN5hZxZ34oKPN9O7sTLLqVRq7y/zeqRlx4M=; b=AXDnN3sDbcudVRnWaXgYFEgueuxMM9l4a1+7SoLmojm3DoSYvZzr+qysUasxiEjXrR iqhfyVuKVSCSA8caiQD28BVhnqtXU6GQyaRQhZ0UQ08iA2Jn4HESHpHWKqsShhk6l3KZ BIZ4NFW00gxvIXkl64Q4TdJld1NIpWOOQvlRaZdzIGZ1tZcd7bXy5T3oRc833cUF1z9v jTRWwZFC/OM3+APgVFGdJeuY1DNrcp7CUgvOFvUyqPS8QPPAWeFVMZl6N9FTyx5O2vB1 rHiKpU8bGs1Ms842SSLijq/9aUd0+k13hBAiAx5nQdik4u+AYjb7Sx4ggTsyUQV0uavB Ysew==
X-Received: by 10.67.3.170 with SMTP id bx10mr27119868pad.34.1450288602208; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:56:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spandex.local (216-67-75-113-radius.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [216.67.75.113]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id hw7sm10658178pac.12.2015.12.16.09.56.41 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:56:41 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <5671A5D7.2080309@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:56:39 -0900
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Hotel situation
References: <20151216174906.14089.qmail@ary.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20151216174906.14089.qmail@ary.lan>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/jI7gTdkKnW8G5GleOpFIsBHqimc>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:56:58 -0000

On 12/16/15 8:49 AM, John Levine wrote:
> Actually, taxis in Buenos Aires are really cheap.  A week's worth of
> taxis won't cost as much as the $160 reciprocity fee that US passport
> holders have to pay.

For individual, self-funded participants marginal increases
in costs (beyond the necessary costs to attend) can turn
painful costs into prohibitive costs.  The decisions that
we're making about these things are implicitly decisions
that we're making about IETF participation.

I continue to believe that deprioritizing meetings would go
a long way towards addressing some number of problems,
but having beat this particular drum for some number of years
it's clear that ain't gonna happen.  But I'm pretty confident
that as long as meeting participation is basically required in
order to move work forward and as long as the meetings are
not optimized around getting work done, there will continue
to be issues.

Melinda