Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard

[Bill Manning <[e-mail]>]

On Aug 31, 2005, at 2:25, Peter Dambier wrote:

> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Margaret Wasserman <[e-mail]> writes:
>>> Other than a few minor issues that are being dealt with in a -43 
>>> update,
>>> I don't think that anyone has raised a blocking technical issue with 
>>> the
>>> LLMNR specification during this IETF LC.  If you (or anyone else) has
>>> intended to raise a blocking technical issue, either with LLMNR 
>>> itself
>>> or with its ability to coexist with mDNS, please make that clearer to
>>> me.
>
> Sorry I overlooked this:
>
> I dont count 25% of the root server traffic a minor issue.
> With 90% of root server traffic used to be for localhost and with
> 25% of root server traffic already for local, we are looking into
> a major DoS attack. This might overload ISPs DNS servers it might
> even bring the root servers down if they let it free!
>

	i'm going to have to raise the point that Peters "root-server" system
	is his private "walled-garden" and not representative of the Internet's
	authoritative root servers.   Just for clarification.

--bill


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf