Re: [Ianaplan] last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Fri, 09 January 2015 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023F71A87E4; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 10:12:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VFepDmp5v6ye; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 10:12:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395891A2119; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 10:12:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D3322CC5D; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 20:12:40 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m19bC2ut6S4m; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 20:12:40 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FFB92CC4D; Fri, 9 Jan 2015 20:12:39 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_913846D8-EE02-4E50-AF5F-01B74053DA30"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: [Ianaplan] last call and IESG processing summary for draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <3cb91119f9954db5becaacf20c62ae53@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 19:12:37 +0100
Message-Id: <24D14D91-B193-46A3-A330-3DEA6F8E70A9@piuha.net>
References: <21730E2D-5F0B-45AE-A763-6F61F8AF5D1B@piuha.net> <3181B0DB-BBB4-4674-ADF2-3C03B9CDACD4@piuha.net> <71cb0c49686f43e6ae84871861bffac6@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <13BDD0B3-C87C-4A45-9675-E543650D160A@piuha.net> <672ec77febd64147bafdabea7cd2a608@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu> <54AD89D3.7070103@gmail.com> <3cb91119f9954db5becaacf20c62ae53@EX13-MBX-13.ad.syr.edu>
To: Milton L Mueller <mueller@syr.edu>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/jKz3h5TNeYeTQjIHeQ2WCInFbgM>
Cc: "Ianaplan@Ietf. Org" <ianaplan@ietf.org>, "internal-cg@icann.org" <internal-cg@icann.org>, "draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ianaplan-icg-response.all@tools.ietf.org>, IETF-Discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 18:12:45 -0000

> I would accept "The WG consensus did not agree with including the recommendations in the ICG response but this does not preclude the IAOC from pursuing them.”

I think that is fine too (speaking as one IAOC member). Moving on...

Jari