Re: Last Call: Moving RFC 4405, RFC 4406, RFC 4407 (Sender-ID) to Historic

"Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com> Sat, 12 May 2018 21:41 UTC

Return-Path: <sob@sobco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F19BF12EAD8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 May 2018 14:41:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3cLQJ9JBT112 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 12 May 2018 14:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sobco.sobco.com (unknown [136.248.127.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 219CA127873 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sat, 12 May 2018 14:41:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9088E67A67DD; Sat, 12 May 2018 17:41:24 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at sobco.com
Received: from sobco.sobco.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (sobco.sobco.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yYtNFNz9gm8b; Sat, 12 May 2018 17:41:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.16] (173-166-5-69-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.5.69]) by sobco.sobco.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BF8767A67C7; Sat, 12 May 2018 17:41:10 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.3 \(3445.6.18\))
Subject: Re: Last Call: Moving RFC 4405, RFC 4406, RFC 4407 (Sender-ID) to Historic
From: "Scott O. Bradner" <sob@sobco.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABuGu1p8r5=9QTSuXaasix5gm4FbqB1GKJ+UO22-OCh6Hcu7Kg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 17:41:09 -0400
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7FEC3265-C38B-4BB0-91C4-4F6990D00DA4@sobco.com>
References: <152588285893.3989.7909763661642193132.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAC4RtVCq-27o7QjVfd8pES0Zi4zHaOs9uWh4eDR+L_Y4Os_JLg@mail.gmail.com> <01QSDU0RB1QY000051@mauve.mrochek.com> <CABuGu1p8r5=9QTSuXaasix5gm4FbqB1GKJ+UO22-OCh6Hcu7Kg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Kurt Andersen <kurta@drkurt.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.6.18)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/jN-xW4xFa76to4vWULe1bL7k4ug>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 21:41:31 -0000

I would sure rather the justification were published as an RFC so people can find the reasons in the future

Scott


> On May 12, 2018, at 12:28 PM, Kurt Andersen <kurta@drkurt.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 3:49 PM, <ned+ietf@mauve.mrochek.com> wrote:
> Ditto. This change is if anything overdue.
> 
>                                 Ned
> 
> > I fully agree with and support this status change.
> 
> > Barry
> 
> > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:20 PM, The IESG <iesg-secretary@ietf.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > The IESG has received a request from DMARC WG to make the
> > > following status changes:
> > >
> > > - RFC4405 from Experimental to Historic
> > >     (SMTP Service Extension for Indicating the Responsible Submitter of an
> > >     E-Mail Message)
> > >
> > > - RFC4406 from Experimental to Historic
> > >     (Sender ID: Authenticating E-Mail)
> > >
> > > - RFC4407 from Experimental to Historic
> > >     (Purported Responsible Address in E-Mail Messages)
> > >
> > > The supporting document for this request can be found here:
> > >
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-change-sender-id-to-historic/
> 
> Completely in favor as I had initially proposed this during IETF101. 
> 
> --Kurt Andersen
>