Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd)

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca> Mon, 20 September 2004 19:01 UTC

Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA01022; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:01:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C9TWF-0004gY-QV; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:08:12 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C9TES-0006c2-5E; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:49:48 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1C9T5a-0004sw-3q; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:40:38 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA29300; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:40:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from cyphermail.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca ([205.150.200.161] helo=noxmail.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C9TBm-0004F7-Sn; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:47:03 -0400
Received: from lox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (IDENT:root@lox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca [205.150.200.178]) by noxmail.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (8.11.6p3/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i8KIeTa09709 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168 bits) verified FAIL); Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:40:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [205.150.200.247]) by lox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (8.11.6p3/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i8KIkgw20501 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168 bits) verified NO); Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:46:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (marajade [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (8.12.11/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i8KIcquv004928; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:38:52 -0400
Received: from marajade.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (mcr@localhost) by sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (8.12.11/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i8KIcp86004925; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:38:51 -0400
To: iesg@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: Message from Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> of "Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:28:44 +0200." <239B699D32BD4A0F33F883AB@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0409200834140.22679-100000@netcore.fi> <414EC71C.6030109@zurich.ibm.com> <239B699D32BD4A0F33F883AB@B50854F0A9192E8EC6CDA126>
X-Mailer: MH-E 7.4.2; nmh 1.0.4+dev; XEmacs 21.4 (patch 15)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 1.8)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:38:51 -0400
Message-ID: <4924.1095705531@marajade.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: c1c65599517f9ac32519d043c37c5336
Subject: Re: WG Review: Behavior Engineering for Hindrance Avoidance (behave) (fwd)
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 4d87d2aa806f79fed918a62e834505ca

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>>>>> "Harald" == Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> writes:
    Harald> My take (which is obviously biased) is that the number of
    Harald> NAT devices 2 years from now is likely to be significantly
    Harald> larger than the number of NAT devices currently deployed.

  Yes, I agree.
  And multiple layers too. And at higher speed points in the network.

    Harald> And - here I am making a real leap of faith - if the IETF
    Harald> recommendations for NAT devices make manufacturers who
    Harald> listen to them create NAT devices that make their customers
    Harald> more happy, then many of these new NAT devices may be
    Harald> conformant to IETF recommendations.

  Do we really want customers of NAT devices to be happy?
  
    Harald> (Note - I sympathize with Pekka's touching faith in Teredo
    Harald> as the Big Solution.... I hope he's right. So the NAT
    Harald> recommendations may in that case boil down to a single
    Harald> sentence:

    Harald> "Don't break Teredo"

    Harald> If that's the case.... it's worth saying.)

  I don't think we need a working group to say this.
  I think that the IAB could write a document much easier that said
that.

- --
]     "Elmo went to the wrong fundraiser" - The Simpson         |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson,    Xelerance Corporation, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@xelerance.com      http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/mcr/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQCVAwUBQU8juoqHRg3pndX9AQGf5QQAmosDzc+v6l5dhfmedxwaikVvmFhe6/eE
LR/Re6jZ5NTjv6r51ea51bN8WOndaWp6zskwXLf+dKKfk0Ymqez7KN42nwmta0Qi
2eow3xUbzsse4zAXYH2Op7HLHJEZS4SQ16M92TBxay9hvoYj6mKnkxOp5DdbMXeQ
RhFiISfLMIg=
=NZkz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf