IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposed New Note Well

Jorge Contreras <cntreras@gmail.com> Tue, 05 January 2016 00:18 UTC

Return-Path: <cntreras@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12FE01ACD90; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:18:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r7EfDnrilNQb; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:18:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-io0-x230.google.com (mail-io0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D744C1ACD8D; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:18:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-io0-x230.google.com with SMTP id 1so125065958ion.1; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 16:18:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=cx7PCMxbFaD9U5a3t15MnwFjdU8Dt6VPbZRQ0mWRBH0=; b=lvjCB92BeEnJS4277epVxKcBVk89JxPYfryX1xAdVSOwYWFuRiqlcs3hR5gT31ZF7c sWDjfx+N3jCYzhpj/NaxNIVhDJwrRRw5aYH2L4nxlK9k83OVZEF8/M+++S8bRv8k9zyy wn2TliU8liLtdwIGY2RTW9ZS5FiujWKIwJwjOtxtqVB/d13a7ScbdfuIzIk05V9tqXT/ uJobxl0k74SKC+L1Ewzb4z6rvOXOjVPqFqYc+x+9RO84VmcwhAAjKxpdxDXSYtL2u3jG pP8gj7Lx1nXYXb3r461wqUPvddHlzWzF0vut8WLdwAz+yALq/fPA+7IvNRRca8BVC4Uv IoLA==
X-Received: by 10.107.10.217 with SMTP id 86mr70421025iok.75.1451953103086; Mon, 04 Jan 2016 16:18:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.249.198 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:17:43 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <092401d14708$d4299360$7c7cba20$@olddog.co.uk>
References: <20160104154102.1127.50621.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <092401d14708$d4299360$7c7cba20$@olddog.co.uk>
From: Jorge Contreras <cntreras@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2016 17:17:43 -0700
Message-ID: <CAP0PwYbO6ycG0p17ZSkDo9BaTtev0XXiGbybyPJ+mc6MAWw2SQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Proposed New Note Well
To: "adrian@olddog.co.uk" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113de8d6f0aac005288b2c02"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/jVS8cJkbsFpk1-u9i8qHjX4L1xc>
Cc: IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 00:18:26 -0000

> • Personal information that you provide to IETF will be handled in
accordance

> > with the IETF Privacy Statement set.
>
> Is the word "set" superfluous here?


Actually, there are words missing.  This sentence was supposed to say: "
... the IETF Privacy Statement set forth at http://ietf.org/xxxx" (where
xxxx is the location of a still-being-completed document (you may recall
that such a document was distributed for community comment a while ago, and
those comments are currently being processed with the privacy lawyers).

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status