Re: IPv4 Outage Planned for IETF 71 Plenary

Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Mon, 17 December 2007 22:20 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4OJz-0004Bb-0i; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:20:23 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4OJw-0004BJ-Ao for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:20:20 -0500
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com ([147.28.0.81]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4OJv-00034v-Ud for ietf@ietf.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:20:20 -0500
Received: from [192.103.16.81] ([192.103.16.81]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lBHMKGi8071171; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 22:20:17 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <4766F611.2050201@bogus.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:20:01 -0800
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20071115)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
References: <E1J3IFS-0002yV-CG@ietf.org> <20071214220518.GA14379@sources.org> <47631201.1070303@bogus.com> <p06240806c388d88dc9de@[165.227.249.204]> <a06240800c388daca0917@[192.168.1.101]> <4763EBD3.50804@cisco.com> <37AF8EDE-2B6F-49DB-8D02-0674B4F47677@multicasttech.com> <0C29D33E-3BAD-4564-B0F3-6F7A5D1A8B59@muada.com> <20071217093519.CDA83220285@quill.bollow.ch> <tslmys98grt.fsf@mit.edu> <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C31661557084F93@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
In-Reply-To: <2788466ED3E31C418E9ACC5C31661557084F93@mou1wnexmb09.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.1/5160/Mon Dec 17 16:46:31 2007 on nagasaki.bogus.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 08170828343bcf1325e4a0fb4584481c
Cc: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IPv4 Outage Planned for IETF 71 Plenary
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:

> There is no shortage of address space in net 10. There will always be
> plenty of IPV4 address space for people to run private networks to
> laptops and the like behind a NAT.

Given how much business we have selling nat boxes that can deal with the
same ip on both sides I would dispute that.

The usability of ipv4 private address space is compromised quite a bit
when you need enough that you have to maintain parallel management
structures for multiple instances of the same space, your customers use
that the same ip ranges internally and networks you need to interconnect
with use the same space as well.


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf