IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Enough is Enough.

Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com> Tue, 20 October 2020 17:09 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@dropnumber.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC533A0C1B; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:09:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.795
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.795 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vEhF-abcvODs; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:09:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.197]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B53E23A0BC0; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 10:09:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxusgaltgw13.schlund.de ([10.72.72.59]) by mrelay.perfora.net (mreueus002 [74.208.5.2]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MDzNh-1ke0cs2NGJ-00HQPu; Tue, 20 Oct 2020 19:09:41 +0200
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 13:09:41 -0400
From: Timothy Mcsweeney <tim@dropnumber.com>
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Cc: "ietf-draft-submission@ietf.org" <ietf-draft-submission@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <1244503240.69594.1603213781185@email.ionos.com>
In-Reply-To: <VI1P194MB02851798998F8B7CAE17EBEBAE1F0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
References: <VI1P194MB02851798998F8B7CAE17EBEBAE1F0@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Subject: Re: Enough is Enough.
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Open-Xchange Mailer v7.10.3-Rev23
X-Originating-Client: open-xchange-appsuite
X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:+geFFh526L8QkNUbAST22juKwBqoBl78iFPOV9f+sBTgrHxzWmc DCuEG9IPM+QaZ4d3p1BD1ZAY52MLIipbkQGGllJ8VOPwxA46INGXb3So0g2tFdqUx0s2Rbd sWrZr5+c07ehNOpDXmMIuOkh8KlhOsC+E7NGUpVriftHBY7Fg27AHqldpvZtd//QTNbUtEB M1tD0KYS5gls+C+DNR6UQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:MaXcg3UWkpY=:h0CFonrvCbPa72Rx6F0n/O PUPLJyOCc3gWVMom+0cnfFYECcJc63hmaNtdhiE/98C51NHoXAEUq9nrvgETtlmHkTC7YWStk wEV7I3dggKMc2VTC5ly1rJ1cswyZB5H3dIlGGYMV84N3L+ncxSRBj8lCpN/8uJHLPXPYFcYNz kStlZzwga0tI1PDXUg7OU7GFEKWaOrgqgrlobacw2ysrYF6vuOKEdYw3vhMJ2KL6goABNw2qU N2aoTflxiDxk0QQb7a1OBwgLgjZcO69g8Ctk9Pus2GSKn/AXiPMMI7KQFA98yr6CcdnA8JP4z Vb7c/htoZCbI/N8O3nsNMP6VeRdYscl1K5fO6Sqrv9CbOW5VaH4nPxxiBF/g6l3Q1CK5fUFrJ HDcbZ640s+Ts10C6B0Yj9Fr585DgwFQDhiIR38qR1WBKZ6l/QxuhTZBpp0QFuYg42c0LdNeS4 co1NFU17NA==
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/j_wAgsrBojENq21YT4X_uPYjmWo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2020 17:09:47 -0000

I would ask an IESG member.  And I think Jay Daley offered up legal@ietf.org on a different thread.


On 10/20/2020 1:00 PM Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> wrote:


Dear IETFers,


I hope this is my last e-mail with the IETF and I’m not feeling coward to repeat my first request regarding deleting my drafts from the IETF repository.


Can anyone tell me whom is the responsible person for deleting drafts from the IETF?


P.S. I don’t want to find any BCP or whatever that mention that the original author of the draft has not the right to ask for deleting his drafts as this doesn’t make any sense.


I wish you good luck after the deletion and the ideas not being used by the IETF as they have no benefits as many claims.


Sorry for any disturbance.


Regards,


Khaled Omar



v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email