Five softwires documents last called today.
Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 26 September 2014 19:41 UTC
Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A9D21A00B7 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:41:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.686
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.686 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.786] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xR5eJTQMv0pK for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com (shell-too.nominum.com [64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E09C31A000A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4381B864A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C8753E07B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:41:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.10.40] (71.233.43.215) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:41:03 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Five softwires documents last called today.
Message-ID: <1F534DC3-B638-4204-BB8B-0C1C64AC6782@nominum.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 15:40:43 -0400
To: IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Originating-IP: [71.233.43.215]
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/jcscmIHmAQSvXLAlLLvfhnC2P8A
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 19:41:05 -0000
I finished my AD review for five softwire documents that I believe are closely related, and last-called them as a group so that interested parties could review them that way. These documents all solve largely the same problem, but in usefully (IMHO) different ways from an operational perspective. If you intend to read all five documents and aren't currently very familiar with how this technology works, I would suggest reading the lw4over6 document first, the map-dhcp document second, the map document third, the map-t document fourth, and the 4rd document fifth. This is just my personal opinion on how best to bootstrap your understanding, and shouldn't be taken to mean that I prefer one document to another.