Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com> Thu, 26 March 2020 20:11 UTC

Return-Path: <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D7963A08BE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 13:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.507
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.507 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DATE_IN_PAST_03_06=1.592, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bTKrGKRSNd7u for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 13:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x330.google.com (mail-wm1-x330.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::330]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A3913A0786 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 13:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x330.google.com with SMTP id g62so8987205wme.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 13:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=4dNnkV8QIz0WeTtj9aK5x6l1Zz/VnRvt1oMnS60lP9M=; b=bOVAXVkzLKtKHJBocUoOJD1n1OT9Ejvdqg+1LmjMMiX15zYevCfnrCZJhWZ0EqULt0 e5G5gDWkKDRS9IQczsxfhgiy+S3Yr3IRzggZxr/BszzJMx0rXxyRlmEjLsGitu+rbJQs BlYBnlnmhRzaf1Ib26A08ACWAYVuyZw2/s4hkU9CsEuoZYvRpaB5VDwf13+ugM92zi7f 5mG+P/pxhrXH3XJqBgsBK0HdQHg5d4aSNFRJWyVqLJlhSYNXQ4gKc6rcAd/xad2hPB78 tWEb+W9FHG9bajg7H0+9deneq7uhtAgYmMhQutpIetpJ5jYbwzH0sFdglRoWF3WD4XmS mi9w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=4dNnkV8QIz0WeTtj9aK5x6l1Zz/VnRvt1oMnS60lP9M=; b=O4Sg8upsDLNP35SdCKIFkbZDpMahhVh02aNyCi2jC4BBaAfx8NfBBL4tCad1ZJMUBq RLxzcSccshSdojYukBm6YQJV7ulVgqtR8TJifuHE0KtFNvN8IV+pIdxyFoUEeXDDAuaa 6RghU1n6GBlOyGSVGSCq68XpX/yz22QUUmnJVQkjImqSGk9aiNIMLSm1/7a0aezWosR3 JC0zizACPeHC9fyPtlRRZd36KoNEte9v5OUGt/gFKIrUDLsV3xU//Oug8QXL/FvLi3mV 2Pk2u6Jvr+rQ+ZnR8+iLRobySOSU09drSCXgvYOR2r126HuDPjQez+IKJmNHsIxyxs3t kEFg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3KA7c9J2fbOk50CUARUuyQ9DskVwF7bwpBFPKv7zo1XF8193mo How57jnNKzXWD+Ow7uzatSc=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtBD04u6YlWgzdBfUfPj6EG3v0woF6l498Gj/W1NcII76zKKRKA3A13eF456b7p0/2BYksylA==
X-Received: by 2002:adf:9465:: with SMTP id 92mr11170352wrq.122.1585253499472; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 13:11:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.46] ([62.3.64.16]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 9sm4744000wmm.6.2020.03.26.13.11.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 26 Mar 2020 13:11:38 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
From: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC4RtVAhfFLYwzqw6Qch3BpuMvqjZPzFJ5o1iTOwR+yqH8j-Aw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 15:01:22 +0000
Cc: Stewart Bryant <stewart.bryant@gmail.com>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5A6B0A7D-7D8A-4358-9949-7B09CE441882@gmail.com>
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVAhfFLYwzqw6Qch3BpuMvqjZPzFJ5o1iTOwR+yqH8j-Aw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/jvBiCld-yAZ49Pjb2LP9d3A91w0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 20:11:43 -0000

What worries me is how someone that has not been to a IETF a few times can be I a position to understand how it works and the nuances of the information that are presented. Also in person presence shows a level of commitment to the organisation which is essential to fulfil the Nomcom duties.

The criteria were set for a reason and we should abide by that rationale. For that reason I would prefer that the criteria be remained at three recent physical meetings as it currently is.

If, as is likely, we end up with a virtual meeting in Summer we can think again, but for now we should stick with the original criteria of 3/5 in person meetings.

- Stewart