Re: [MEXT] Last Call: draft-ietf-mext-nemo-pd (DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation for NEMO) to Proposed Standard

[Alexandru Petrescu <[e-mail]>]

Le 11/09/2010 08:13, Hesham Soliman a écrit :
>
>
>
> On 11/09/10 12:34 AM, "Alexandru Petrescu"<[e-mail]>
> wrote:
>
>> Le 10/09/2010 14:12, Hesham Soliman a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> When it is away from home it is fully a Host on the egress
>>>> interface. When at home fully Router on same.  I am happy with it
>>>> this way.
>>>>
>>>
>>> =>   Ok that doesn't make any sense to me.
>>
>> Well, let me rephrase as the RFC text puts it: when the MR is at home it
>> joins the all-routers multicast address, otherwise it joins the
>> all-hosts address.  ND spec says similar.  Similarly, when MR at home it
>> can send RAs on the egress, if away it MUST NOT send RAs on it.  It must
>> always send RAs on the ingress.  This is to make sure MR doesn't break
>> the Internet routing.
>>
>> Does this sound better?
>
> =>  I thought we were discussing the specific issue of how to solve this
> problem in _this_WG_ as I mentioned in my first email. I know what the RFC
> says and I wouldn't have done it this way but given this, I don't know how
> else you can solve it _here_.

I am open to solve it here and I have suggestion :

- make DHCPv6-PD-NEMO assign a default route to the Mobile Router at
   home.

What do you think?

I also followed advice and went asking to DHC WG.  I got redirected to 
MIF soon-Charter DHCP options route table, and got mentioned 
draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router req W-3 talking DHCPv6-PD and default 
route.

Alex


>
> Hesham
>
>
>
>
>