IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)

"Ole Jacobsen (ole)" <ole@cisco.com> Thu, 09 August 2012 20:47 UTC

Return-Path: <ole@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C4621F86F3 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 13:47:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18equAit9vG8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 13:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.86.76]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1ACE21F86D8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 13:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=ole@cisco.com; l=1620; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1344545266; x=1345754866; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Nrqq+/cOfwKumFNmszzTO2vBe5RJLLluWryR7VJRMJY=; b=Dn4EcZwasUt48e5VB2QVoG+VrqOKslO+dmY4gaJrtugGJ7O4IGn6uaCY W6PKSGkRA+8X404h41tinU/hqmwC7/7uNcbcwafv8R0+b09fW0jt+IrbK OV4FJO3vhLoxB+3jUKAgU6h/xnz+8zpbDlH2wxvl89c3kCgMIbJZMznML g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAIzgI1CtJXHA/2dsb2JhbABFuWKBB4IgAQEBAwESASc7BAUHBAIBCBEEAQEBHgkHMhQJCAIEDgUUDodlBpsGjxaRV4sPhgRgA5VJgRSJeYMcgWaCXw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,742,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="110097833"
Received: from rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com ([173.37.113.192]) by rcdn-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Aug 2012 20:47:46 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com [173.37.183.76]) by rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q79Kljb7030754 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 9 Aug 2012 20:47:45 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.9.98]) by xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([173.37.183.76]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Thu, 9 Aug 2012 15:47:44 -0500
From: "Ole Jacobsen (ole)" <ole@cisco.com>
To: John C Klensin <john-ietf@jck.com>
Subject: Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)
Thread-Topic: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)
Thread-Index: AQHNdm+CPY9STExk+0qjcr7YA02QG5dR85T4
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 20:47:44 +0000
Message-ID: <629A968E-8104-4E6D-B393-CEBEDEC5FFDD@cisco.com>
References: <31BCE4DE825B3F4D9E452EFBBD3F1EF2834A0516@PACDCEXMB01.cable.comcast.com> <502169E9.9020009@dcrocker.net> <AC30AAA7-8634-4851-86CC-6F64095BB600@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|0ebd669a4eccc2cca00daf1beb84ed50o76MuX03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|AC30AAA7-8634-4851-86CC-6F64095BB600@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <39C56E09-72AD-4C99-9A62-3992DEF04D70@shinkuro.com> <01af01cd74f5$217e5770$647b0650$@us> <5021CDDE.8060207@dcrocker.net> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1208071937500.20339@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net> <B33DB90A-5819-4CEE-AE99-DAEC5CC5425C@proto6.com> <80A0822C5E9A4440A5117C2F4CD36A64041CD5E4@DEMUEXC006.nsn-intra.net> <E4873516F3FC7547BCFE792C7D94039C0236B662@DEMUEXC013.nsn-intra.ne t>, <359C3335DECB3764A8BC37B3@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
In-Reply-To: <359C3335DECB3764A8BC37B3@JcK-HP8200.jck.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-tm-as-product-ver: SMEX-10.2.0.1135-7.000.1014-19098.001
x-tm-as-result: No--40.083400-8.000000-31
x-tm-as-user-approved-sender: No
x-tm-as-user-blocked-sender: No
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>, "dcrocker@bbiw.net" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>, ext Geoff Mulligan <geoff@proto6.com>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 20:47:47 -0000

Yes, and sadly that rules out really good venues such as Kuala Lumpur, quite possibly the least expensive (hotel wise) suitable location in Asia.

Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor & Publisher
http://cisco.com/ipj

Sent from my iPhone

On 9 Aug 2012, at 13:42, "John C Klensin" <john-ietf@jck.com> wrote:

> Let me say that a different way.  We sometimes have to tolerate
> countries, like the US, who a fussy about visas or immigration
> procedures for people coming from specific other countries.  I
> wish we didn't.  But, as soon as a country says "if you have a
> passport from X, you aren't getting in, don't even bother to
> apply for a visa", they should be off our list of possibilities.
> 
>   john
> 
> 
> --On Thursday, August 09, 2012 22:22 +0200 "Sprecher, Nurit (NSN
> - IL/Hod HaSharon)" <nurit.sprecher@nsn.com> wrote:
> 
>> Istanbul, Dubai, and similar places will not allow all of us
>> in the community to participate in the meetings.... 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ietf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org] On
>> Behalf Of Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
>> Sent: Thursday, August 09, 2012 11:20 PM
>> To: ext Geoff Mulligan; Ole Jacobsen
>> Cc: ietf@ietf.org; dcrocker@bbiw.net; Richard Shockey
>> Subject: RE: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management
>> granularity)
>> 
>> Why not consider Istanbul? It's another nice harbor city.
>> 
>> Has a series of world class hotels like Grand Hyatt, Hilton,
>> InterContinental, Radisson Blu but also less expensive hotels,
>> close to each other.
> 
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email