IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.txt> (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry) to BCP

Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Mon, 31 January 2011 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E75B3A6B32; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:11:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.756
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.756 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.290, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MKwMntZxMrzm; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:11:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF243A6AC9; Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:11:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MacBook-08.local (75-101-30-90.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [75.101.30.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p0VFEQ3e066616 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:14:26 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Message-ID: <4D46D1D3.10701@vpnc.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 07:14:27 -0800
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-tsvwg-iana-ports-09.txt> (Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) Procedures for the Management of the Service Name and Transport Protocol Port Number Registry) to BCP
References: <20110118212603.5733.34489.idtracker@localhost> <B88A8A82-9C4A-40AC-89AF-F177260760F7@cisco.com> <ECA80A72-4E72-44D2-B40E-C90D7197E8C5@nokia.com> <4D421795.70505@isi.edu> <EFADE5D0-BB33-4418-B743-DFEC11B12740@cisco.com> <4D44F85D.5030407@isi.edu> <4D457FD9.5030905@vpnc.org> <B1E38EDF-E78E-47E2-B9A9-D7320A908217@nokia.com> <4D46CC62.1040006@vpnc.org> <3EEDEA1C-C34B-4F39-8E6E-AEDE50C1E504@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <3EEDEA1C-C34B-4F39-8E6E-AEDE50C1E504@nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, IESG IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, tsvwg@ietf.org, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 15:11:21 -0000

On 1/31/11 7:06 AM, Lars Eggert wrote:
> But I see the point you're raising. The document should somewhere say
> that "Expert Review" is the procedure used for assignment requests
> made directly to IANA, whereas for documents on the IETF Stream,
> "IETF Consensus" is sufficient to make the assignment. In other
> words, no expert review doesn't really need to happen for those,
> since IETF Review and IESG Approval are at least equivalent.
>
> Did I get that right?

Yes, that would greatly reduce the concern about where and when (and how 
often!) the review would happen.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email