Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)

Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com> Wed, 08 August 2012 02:55 UTC

Return-Path: <ole@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4357D21F84FE for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 19:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.563
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.563 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.036, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FxBxfoYL27Ih for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 19:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-2.cisco.com (mtv-iport-2.cisco.com [173.36.130.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CFA921F84EE for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 19:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=ole@cisco.com; l=2128; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1344394524; x=1345604124; h=date:from:reply-to:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=ZM+Iymub4ps9u7cvOc3Fj32Ee0GpKI2f8DUN54zDi18=; b=HUHzLHgcI/c0gVM4F/TToUp8HjdzUIAYY7SlNi95ukLfVqde08PXIIDr 7nhiinKK0yzRLmF39rDP/R8Bae4YeMlwHPDSCHxlgKFPS1FcLWswq4Rip jCmCWMraXd+K+0N4WlZmWl0XDQzPYNrtxOhgFASGwyd9EJuvXTY5J3PWX I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EAA/UIVCrRDoH/2dsb2JhbABCA7lngQeCIQEBBBIBAiUtEhALRlcZGQmHappZg0gQnH6LJwIKgxsFgxwDiE2SVoUxgxqBBGKCf4E/
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,730,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="54389937"
Received: from mtv-core-2.cisco.com ([171.68.58.7]) by mtv-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 08 Aug 2012 02:55:24 +0000
Received: from [10.27.1.132] (sjc-ole-8913.cisco.com [10.27.1.132]) by mtv-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q782tN3o017547 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Aug 2012 02:55:24 GMT
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 19:55:23 -0700
From: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Subject: Re: So, where to repeat? (was: Re: management granularity)
In-Reply-To: <5021CDDE.8060207@dcrocker.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1208071937500.20339@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net>
References: <31BCE4DE825B3F4D9E452EFBBD3F1EF2834A0516@PACDCEXMB01.cable.comcast.com> <502169E9.9020009@dcrocker.net> <AC30AAA7-8634-4851-86CC-6F64095BB600@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|0ebd669a4eccc2cca00daf1beb84ed50o76MuX03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|AC30AAA7-8634-4851-86CC-6F64095BB600@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <39C56E09-72AD-4C99-9A62-3992DEF04D70@shinkuro.com> <01af01cd74f5$217e5770$647b0650$@us> <5021CDDE.8060207@dcrocker.net>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (OSX 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2012 02:55:25 -0000

You said about Prague:

"...[do] folks who live outside of that region not care about the 
additional hop of travel to get to it?"

This gets cited often, and I don't really understand why. There are 
VERY few European cities that are reachable directly from the US (or 
Asia for that matter). Most require transiting some kind of major hub 
(London, Paris, Frankfurt, Amsterdam to name a few). There will always 
be exceptions, I am sure you can get to Stockholm directly from the US 
East Coast, but not from the West Coast. I am sure a very large 
percentage of the IETF attendees from the US went through London or 
Frankfurt (or a small number of alternatives) to get to Stockholm on 
the two occasions when we met there.

Since I travel to Norway on a more or less regular basis, I am used to 
(and quite happy to) go through Frankfurt or London, it's just a fact 
of life especially if you factor in the "preferred carrier" (personal 
or corporate). Prague may be an "extra hop," but depending on 
schedules you might well get to your destination (hotel) just as 
quickly as you would for getting from CDG to central Paris or LHR to 
central London.

If we restrict European cities to the ones with direct flight 
connections from other continents, we're really limiting the choices. 
Let's be a little more realistic and consider actual travel "pain" 
from the top hubs in Europe, assuming we can't (always) meet in those 
places.

I do understand that the extra hop does add some cost, which is why
I always consider trains as a reasonable alternative, albeit not a
particularly fast one. For example, the cost for a First Class train
ticket from Frankfurt to Prague was 98 Euros. I am not suggesting
that this is always going to be a reasonable alternative, and I am
worried that the mere mention of "train" on this list may result in
a flame war, but still...

Ole



Ole J. Jacobsen
Editor and Publisher,  The Internet Protocol Journal
Cisco Systems
Tel: +1 408-527-8972   Mobile: +1 415-370-4628
E-mail: ole@cisco.com  URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj
Skype: organdemo