Re: SV: Concerns about Singapore

mrex@sap.com (Martin Rex) Fri, 08 April 2016 16:38 UTC

Return-Path: <mrex@sap.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC8412D969 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.921
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.921 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IQ9y_Yu6KoOf for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpde01.smtp.sap-ag.de (smtpde01.smtp.sap-ag.de [155.56.68.170]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC09912D967 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 09:38:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail05.wdf.sap.corp (mail05.sap.corp [194.39.131.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtpde01.smtp.sap-ag.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BFB22B1BA; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 18:38:06 +0200 (CEST)
X-purgate-ID: 152705::1460133486-000073AB-8FDEE741/0/0
X-purgate-size: 710
X-purgate: clean
X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information)
X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de
X-purgate-type: clean
X-SAP-SPAM-Status: clean
Received: from ld9781.wdf.sap.corp (ld9781.wdf.sap.corp [10.21.82.193]) by mail05.wdf.sap.corp (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79AC40F1F; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 18:38:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by ld9781.wdf.sap.corp (Postfix, from userid 10159) id 9E46C1A48A; Fri, 8 Apr 2016 18:38:05 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: SV: Concerns about Singapore
In-Reply-To: <55791011d19e40a792999c45b571ecc2@exchange02.office.nic.se>
To: Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder <anne-marie.eklund-lowinder@iis.se>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 18:38:05 +0200
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL125 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Message-Id: <20160408163805.9E46C1A48A@ld9781.wdf.sap.corp>
From: mrex@sap.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/kPE8VjkPGAHIPl6rWO1WaUfVFKU>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mrex@sap.com
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2016 16:38:11 -0000

Anne-Marie Eklund-Löwinder wrote:
> 
> Well, if you start to dance spontaneously on a restaurant in Sweden
> you are in trouble. It's a law against that.
> 
> The law is from the 1920ies or so. No one bothered to change it.

IETF 83rd was in Paris, France, March 25-30, 2012

At that time there still was a law on the books that women
walking in public in Paris in trousers/pants (rather than dress or skirt)
could be taken into custody by the police.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/9845545/Women-in-Paris-finally-allowed-to-wear-trousers.html

Did any women wearing pants in public during IETF 83rd in Paris
got taken into custody by the police?

-Martin