IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: What ASN.1 got right

Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> Thu, 04 March 2021 17:19 UTC

Return-Path: <nico@cryptonector.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C2933A1141 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:19:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NUQv6OBtdaCQ for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:19:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from butterfly.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (butterfly.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 478663A1142 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:19:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C20C363383; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 17:19:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a25.g.dreamhost.com (100-96-11-30.trex.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.96.11.30]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D9E463632AB; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 17:19:08 +0000 (UTC)
X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a25.g.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 100.96.11.30 (trex/6.0.2); Thu, 04 Mar 2021 17:19:09 +0000
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost
X-Invention-Slimy: 7c48c4a94ed457dd_1614878349233_3187777249
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1614878349233:121732248
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1614878349232
Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a25.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a25.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9FA8774E; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:19:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; h=date :from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=cryptonector.com; bh=TEiez9VhJ0BXR4 8D63rsScanFDA=; b=Evna6CTxCYquJizideHFe+o+OGPshFllfvKj6hRasqqesg wPJN3uRpTKg7W0SvDuhWp3c3jiLSNbz1kkZpeDlg8YF6OPBcUws3RRo699Ioz5Lw psiBGXPUAID9UzfjcnfbI6rK5gIOM1bEdEh1X6lx2EZvdO1YW/Yf5GWtO7tHs=
Received: from localhost (unknown [24.28.108.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a25.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DBC687748; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:19:06 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 11:19:03 -0600
X-DH-BACKEND: pdx1-sub0-mail-a25
From: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
To: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: What ASN.1 got right
Message-ID: <20210304171902.GT30153@localhost>
References: <20210302010731.GL30153@localhost> <0632b948-9ed1-f2bd-96da-9922ebb2aa60@mtcc.com> <YECpybvczdbKHvHx@puck.nether.net> <CAMm+LwiiySi5O1_WDc4-F9x1XfMFFvE-rEbc4uw+31DHJNEHEA@mail.gmail.com> <20210304155223.GM30153@localhost> <1f60a046-801a-2204-197b-723dd16924c7@mtcc.com> <20210304171120.GR30153@localhost> <296ba615-46a5-dff1-3ba6-b6dc69231e51@mtcc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <296ba615-46a5-dff1-3ba6-b6dc69231e51@mtcc.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/kR0rhloXNnzVP98Uc45RW41OOcM>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2021 17:19:11 -0000

On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 09:15:36AM -0800, Michael Thomas wrote:
> On 3/4/21 9:11 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 09:04:27AM -0800, Michael Thomas wrote:
> > > On 3/4/21 7:52 AM, Nico Williams wrote:
> > > Um, why should we care about that? Nothing else cares about holding state.
> > I explained in the text you didn't quote.  Did you somehow miss it?
> 
> You asserted it, yes.

And then you asked me to.. what, assert it again?  Or did you want more
details?  Was your question an implied dismissal of my earlier
explanation?  That's just rude.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email