Re: DMARC and ietf.org

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Fri, 12 August 2016 22:23 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D9912D773 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 15:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vrYH_SK7Wd-d for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 15:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22e.google.com (mail-oi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBCF112D633 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 15:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id l203so52074805oib.1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 15:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uuJ+PM/ErqYS9BGKeJtUaJMVc6M4F/VPbVmKhPgeSl8=; b=kyRHmjncs079PXaKsF2A7kYNvYysWLd/XoxYAfnm9clr2Dh/2mwewqkh3VVUDu/+Dn OGxUJ8tCUKUtuYznW0B9q6PPJS4RHVHvKIAEICk2rCkj7qC+pCHl/O5qwcGiHUNLRq+H zZHhaw1fs8ZAp2otySYwvnUusVdCwrvhtyQH201z5q3T4dIGrxfeSuR4bxUB8ZaIhxad DLnOvWe9+KZex9mWgBpZsJG3KiKf2nJhf8dfwY2NZ4PGbJgskis1u3RZ8XU0GFefgpXy EiU5B/45HiAkmEN+ed3Sczp+/IhQyfy02nOpK9Sui5en2RGxa5hqTiNtMxb9aWbeeWfT BBJg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uuJ+PM/ErqYS9BGKeJtUaJMVc6M4F/VPbVmKhPgeSl8=; b=NPmCk9+C0flTMGL0uST3xxPIy8MRzGKs/74+eMsc20/r62cPM5DcjLrVdsiX1DHK0E l1P3gzYzfKh0KLCqyOP+aMuqaS/imQ+JJDJF840J/3+GcbwCmeztTyuT5VNsHzCTuNVd mH9kVjjmutJtMnaMk9te3g6QZP9gV8iPPYp4z8oPZYKW8sRCxlKxD4PKCcZWAE1Zquit AwG8sU+mEDQNJhPrGw5HoT8vem1AZdKPQk1Dalr0vsMhD9kg1pQNO6uHoLVgAHD4PyHc pd6zG9S4mkWv3XxsjaA5jkHN5yOHnzJVvsDwzJ1j0qwczhu2CjoAiv/nRUwqpXxXRJGq Nk3w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousyPj7q9PbbPG4pZ8Y1aa6Curo3PTj1qFeDWoN/DY4GRMq9GLIVNi0pjvW5m4Y/W1+cqQ6qALCnptYXIg==
X-Received: by 10.202.186.131 with SMTP id k125mr8286756oif.99.1471040632211; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 15:23:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.182.138.35 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 15:23:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <305f4a93-7d4c-681c-18a0-25c7939d2b02@KingsMountain.com>
References: <305f4a93-7d4c-681c-18a0-25c7939d2b02@KingsMountain.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 23:23:31 +0100
Message-ID: <CAA=duU3S0qnPb07etg4jZ5RgrnepyxT-1BkYj7hGbORV++SOXg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: DMARC and ietf.org
To: "=JeffH" <Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113cdda0554c8f0539e75650
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/kReC74fzWpRAkvCIOkrqJrZrA8A>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 22:23:54 -0000

I couldn’t agree more.

Cheers,
Andy


On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 6:20 PM, =JeffH <Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com>
wrote:

>
> Regardless of details, applying some sort of remediation to
> ietf.org/mailman is becoming more pressing IMV -- I am noticing that
> email, sent from pingidentity.com (p=quarantine; pct=100;) via IETF
> mailing lists, is not being delivered to my paypal.com inbox at all.
> Also, the same is occurring for some email from microsoft.com
> (p=quarantine; pct=30;). The same is true for email I might send via my @
> paypal.com persona.
>
> The W3C mailing list manager (MLM) is apparently configured to do
> rfc5322.from field re-writing which seems to ameliorate the DMARC-MLM
> issues (in my experience, at least), and it would be helpful if the IETF
> would take similar measures.
>
> thanks,
>
> =JeffH
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>