Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice

SM <sm@resistor.net> Fri, 06 September 2013 00:23 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B4911E825E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 17:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.558
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.558 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.041, BAYES_00=-2.599, GB_I_LETTER=-2, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qrJ476Bvs508 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 17:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57ED411E8209 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 17:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r860N9OJ000943; Thu, 5 Sep 2013 17:23:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1378426994; bh=h9qwVRUFRoNckThiGtJYMyT77JuLJ+aqFMx08SnweK8=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=3BOxJ06tMwFR41iJWjG1xQ/e7Of2Q9Uw4v8Shb2xOUYBcp6FyYy73u4PoBuJ8dqeX q/CqTVlibNU6GWiu/14m/17G0IBNLtkSK84ZV+f5BFaNwQLJKHwCKVbNAV8OSgCiyl 1Ir+xe05QdCn1PQVMbm5z+QcTRnkVwKw4v5UreRU=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1378426994; i=@resistor.net; bh=h9qwVRUFRoNckThiGtJYMyT77JuLJ+aqFMx08SnweK8=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=nDrUwRur5iqsEqmyQh8FFnkB+C8iz9CRzsx3RMJaAtfAg1wZPkbGuIGUE2jjzWa3A uHbGQj1EjpP6YoH7kY5Fw45Bu0UDaZ0MbDvlsLeyN971MCveYfjyaVgGxHnpkdj2XK ekMScNbIFjwZ5FYyXgfSOl98Fp9h1HM/4Da5IkIc=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130905161245.0b129dc8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2013 16:54:51 -0700
To: Scott O Bradner <sob@sobco.com>, ietf@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-resnick-retire-std1-00.txt> (Retirement of the "Internet Official Protocol Standards" Summary Document) to Best Current Practice
In-Reply-To: <917325CE-1AC9-40CA-92F7-AD28B957DCC2@sobco.com>
References: <20130903141655.29247.40354.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <E74E1804-C61E-4CB2-A40A-CFFEF2714335@harvard.edu> <52260B63.6090504@qti.qualcomm.com> <522642FE.6060100@gmail.com> <52264A79.4020308@qti.qualcomm.com> <AC7694E1-C1A9-447C-B81C-34956C52CA0C@harvard.edu> <52264D5B.4060900@gmail.com> <52265FE1.5080500@gmail.com> <52266A80.707@qti.qualcomm.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20130903161345.0bb3bfc0@resistor.net> <522678D3.7000704@qti.qualcomm.com> <5228BB22.4030909@qti.qualcomm.com> <917325CE-1AC9-40CA-92F7-AD28B957DCC2@sobco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2013 00:23:16 -0000

At 14:45 05-09-2013, Scott O Bradner wrote:
>looks good to me except that maybe using the IETF Announce list rather than
>IESG minutes as the publication of record

What draft-resnick-retire-std1-01 says is that the "publication of 
record" has been the IESG minutes.  I read what Scott Bradner wrote 
as meaning that the IETF will use the IETF Announce list as the 
publication of record.

Suggested text:

    Finally, RFC 2026 [RFC2026] section 6.1.3 also calls for the
    publication of an "official summary of standards actions completed
    and pending" in the Internet Society's newsletter.  This has also not
    been done in recent years.  Therefore, that paragraph is also
    effectively removed from section 6.1.3.  The "publication of record"
    for standards action is the IETF Announce list.

The idea here is to announce the standards action that has been 
taken.  By the way, "publication of record" is different from formal record.

Regards,
-sm