Re: Guidelines for authors and reviewers

SM <sm@resistor.net> Mon, 02 June 2008 06:19 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBDF83A6B94; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 23:19:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33F23A6C84 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 23:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PE0RdXJ7VrRD for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 23:19:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ns1.qubic.net (ns1.qubic.net [208.69.177.116]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11BC13A6CAA for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Jun 2008 23:19:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from subman.resistor.net ([10.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.qubic.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m526Ivxq013701 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 1 Jun 2008 23:19:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1212387550; x=1212473950; bh=mbOEL0//4aVLlI2Mp9jwidFkG7WMjQWhtYfT aVguHts=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Cc; b=TXOPFkIAnnLWi2sLf/FM/8q14pses9aeaV yLQYB2KnKaGySmA16iAR9m/w/posicIgksZbMPqlLeTGQ/G+L45xwA5LI2LTn865d73 4rEi+2+13xgiOWX9bdQy/CcCmVaEomAcNFb5aEFLzEtZRWOXZu7MOLaDkz9qNawGu+s ELU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail; d=resistor.net; c=simple; q=dns; b=YheyPK2l7/a7B1wiKd+wrGXoEV+jaYvGi+prjw1+eItv1junv3wXyDIbz20Yoscno 0jo/j1J2yXEOPvB3Ue27wrfisrg/BkHxiB6f8BJgEvCfxVEieZ+4tNcBp09S7+UnMRq yOmYaoM2ridmIx2c+UNrjV845PkYXRHCM8URMdg=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20080601220837.02ffa5e8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2008 23:14:39 -0700
To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>, ietf@ietf.org
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: Guidelines for authors and reviewers
In-Reply-To: <g1vred$u8s$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <483F2881.40306@ericsson.com> <p06240601c465eaec8585@[129.46.226.27]> <484074DF.20502@ericsson.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20080601151639.02b20e00@resistor.net> <g1vred$u8s$1@ger.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Frank,
At 21:04 01-06-2008, Frank Ellermann wrote:
>Hopefully we'll get a 5555 next year :-)

I hope so too. :-)

>Dunno, independent drafts are non-IETF by definition, using one
>adjective "individual" everywhere at least doesn't add to any
>existing confusion about "individual" vs. "independent" drafts.
>Example:

The topics discussed in this document are relevant to all I-Ds unless 
one views independent drafts as documents set in read-only mode only.

>But the guidelines are for IETF drafts, that's either WG draft
>or individual, but not independent.  Ignoring IAB drafts and

Good point.

Regards,
-sm 

_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf