IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RSE Bid Process

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Mon, 15 July 2019 21:25 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD40B12017E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 14:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fxhXrA8ACCOu for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 14:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C88E312014A for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 14:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2033; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1563225913; x=1564435513; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc: to:references; bh=VVL0hAnkyusnyUKrfZRrN7yhrAZcj7cMGS26ibBK/f0=; b=EustaOXUDT6AyLXtU1YsQb7ZWX5JtcNivsXGJC2c+a+EBOyFq7I+bXJc MRq93tLAGMQ2JLaqkpXI7x4mNmqBzsXmOE7DCQqHYhlQfXwxrJ2C2wjJ2 CPpJPJ/NcVIDegU1hbWwg/TlTbsEi/ZE5nM4otzT3PhdLuCIoXBkmipYM Q=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AEAAAe7ixd/xbLJq1mGgEBAQEBAgEBAQEHAgEBAQGBUwUBAQEBCwGDUQEgEiiMOF+LeJh9gXsCBwEBAQkDAQEvAQGEQAKDCDQJDgEDAQEEAQECAQVthUiFSgEBAQECAXkFCwsYLlcGExSDDgGBew+uCYVHhGQQgTQBgVCKJYF/gREnH4JMPogAgiYElHGVcgmCG4IfgQyQYRuYCqF6gwsCBAYFAhWBUDiBWDMaCBsVZQGCQT6CDxeOIz0DMJArAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.63,494,1557187200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="14271638"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 15 Jul 2019 21:25:10 +0000
Received: from ams3-vpn-dhcp3718.cisco.com (ams3-vpn-dhcp3718.cisco.com [10.61.78.134]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x6FLP9Tr019409 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 15 Jul 2019 21:25:10 GMT
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <84684AC6-D721-46FB-880F-0FF717C81246@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_342AF29F-3705-4433-9EC2-43C0785C2AEF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Subject: Re: RSE Bid Process
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 23:25:09 +0200
In-Reply-To: <4f83144f-d81e-0c1d-f7a9-fca01d268fc0@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: Ted Hardie <ted.ietf@gmail.com>, rsoc@iab.org, S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@elandsys.com>, Internet Architecture Board <iab@iab.org>, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <CA+9kkMALnyeoMJKOgwZ8QP1G+aeSTSBbu4HXAAxdyhcC0K=mDA@mail.gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20190713065007.0c09c018@elandnews.com> <CA+9kkMAbvAdmFAkm5UnsmqWd51KEbFmSE=Jx2pXGUboEm-VYtA@mail.gmail.com> <a9d14442-db99-5907-c422-7d4fc4eebfe4@cs.tcd.ie> <CA+9kkMChvw=wvXrsf+G+iVzLN_vc9x9WQuXaZdghF9Zzxr6sEA@mail.gmail.com> <4f83144f-d81e-0c1d-f7a9-fca01d268fc0@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 10.61.78.134, ams3-vpn-dhcp3718.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: aer-core-3.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/kbpo4zmgyC6jbliz_tY6t9aVGwo>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 21:25:19 -0000

Hi!

> On 15 Jul 2019, at 22:20, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 15/07/2019 15:39, Ted Hardie wrote:
>> 
>> I think the way to do that would be to have the SOW define what the acting
>> RSE's role is and then put that SOW out for RFPs.  Those proposals might
>> well come from community participants whose focus was on facilitation and
>> consensus in IETF contexts, rather than on publication management.
>> 
>> Part of my reasoning here is that the time to conclude a full community
>> discussion isn't really clear yet.  If it takes a year, having an interim
>> RSE with that focus on facilitation may well be the right choice, but it
>> also may require us to fund the volunteer's effort.
> 
> Fair points.
> 
> S.


For this reason and others, I still think it a good idea to leave this in the hands of the IAB and RSOC with the understanding that things are likely to change.  So long as you believe you can get good candidates under those conditions, the community needs to let you do your jobs.

But my perception, and perhaps I am entirely mistaken, is that the community is expecting to have a dialog as you are going about your business, about the longer term view.  I maintain that it would help if that dialog were well structured.

Eliot

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email