IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board

Christian Huitema <huitema@windows.microsoft.com> Thu, 19 February 2009 05:54 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB71A3A68EC for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:54:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rUf8uFr5zRL2 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:54:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (mail2.microsoft.com [131.107.115.215]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 228613A682D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:54:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tk5-exhub-c104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.88.97) by TK5-EXGWY-E802.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.168) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.99.4; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:54:52 -0800
Received: from TK5-EXMLT-W605V.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com (157.54.18.79) by tk5-exhub-c104.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.88.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.2.99.4; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:54:52 -0800
Received: from NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([fe80::75be:c82f:ae04:55bf]) by TK5-EXMLT-W605V.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.18.79]) with mapi; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:54:52 -0800
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>
To: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>, Lawrence Rosen <lrosen@rosenlaw.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:54:49 -0800
Subject: RE: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
Thread-Topic: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
Thread-Index: AcmSPta50gHpQZvXSO+87MdQnXpLWAAF50Jg
Message-ID: <8EFB68EAE061884A8517F2A755E8B60A19DAFCA52D@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
References: <20090217234217.D9FB66BE56A@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <20090217191240.029b7d57@cs.columbia.edu> <C12A100E0BB445E5B8C144839AE93A42@LROSENTOSHIBA> <20090218022441.GA3600@mini-me.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20090218022441.GA3600@mini-me.lan>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:54:40 -0000

This discussion of IPR seems to be running in circle. Can't we switch to something else, e.g. whether RFC could be written in some other format than ASCII text?

-- Christian Huitema

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status