Re: Protocol Definition
tglassey <tglassey@earthlink.net> Sun, 24 June 2012 13:20 UTC
Return-Path: <tglassey@earthlink.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D184521F860B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 06:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.185
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.185 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r+rCLrrBoF4B for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 06:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net (elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net [209.86.89.61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596F921F8633 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 06:20:33 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=GxAjioNK7sSNCcqikhA3/XnWQRNgN9zdgklkLBzyMAq9DLdXWR36bT1pniYzFBeO; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
Received: from [67.180.133.21] (helo=[192.168.15.2]) by elasmtp-galgo.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from <tglassey@earthlink.net>) id 1Simjw-0008AS-Ph; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 09:20:32 -0400
Message-ID: <4FE71418.7060600@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 06:20:24 -0700
From: tglassey <tglassey@earthlink.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tony Finch <dot@dotat.at>, ietf <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Protocol Definition
References: <CADnDZ8_5nH7gNvR_LAB3wJ0zfKh-G0WmWbTm6yDq-M+LMajfbg@mail.gmail.com> <CADnDZ8_XSKgmOq+pfiq=rT5mVRqLk8CnyFKU9CNd+ZG81DJ_xA@mail.gmail.com> <m2y5ng6p99.wl%randy@psg.com> <alpine.LSU.2.00.1206221815380.18854@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1206221815380.18854@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ELNK-Trace: 01b7a7e171bdf5911aa676d7e74259b7b3291a7d08dfec79754bb59eb2d551a848e27f74a711dc45350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c
X-Originating-IP: 67.180.133.21
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 13:20:33 -0000
On 6/22/2012 10:17 AM, Tony Finch wrote: > Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> wrote: > >>> All protocols in IETF are based on the Internet or/and the IP. >> what a laugh. try, for example, RFC 826 > Perhaps a better example is RFC 6325. > > Tony. Try this "The IETFis and open and fair framework produces standards for use in both networking and internetworking services for global communication" and the reasoning is that when ITU and other orgs like it were formed there was not Internetworking or Local Area Networks and so the IETF was formed to emerge the need to facilitate standards in these two key areas which other groups like ITU and IEEE with the underlying 802 work were not providing. -- //Confidential Mailing - Please destroy this if you are not the intended recipient.
- Protocol Definition Kaushal Shriyan
- Re: Protocol Definition Ole Jacobsen
- RE: Protocol Definition Yaakov Stein
- Re: Protocol Definition Dave CROCKER
- Re: Protocol Definition Dave Cridland
- Re: Protocol Definition Dave CROCKER
- Re: Protocol Definition John C Klensin
- Re: Protocol Definition todd glassey
- Re: Protocol Definition Dave CROCKER
- Re: Protocol Definition Douglas Otis
- Re: Protocol Definition Dave Cridland
- Re: Protocol Definition Fernando Gont
- Re: Protocol Definition Dave CROCKER
- Re: Protocol Definition Joel M. Halpern
- Re: Protocol Definition Dave CROCKER
- RE: Protocol Definition Yaakov Stein
- RE: Protocol Definition John Day
- Re: Protocol Definition t.petch
- Re: Protocol Definition John Day
- Re: Protocol Definition Martin Sustrik
- Re: Protocol Definition John Day
- Re: Protocol Definition Martin Sustrik
- Re: Protocol Definition John Day
- Re: Protocol Definition pankaj kumar
- Re: Protocol Definition Dave CROCKER
- Re: Protocol Definition John Day
- RE: Protocol Definition Yaakov Stein
- RE: Protocol Definition John Day
- Re: Protocol Definition Joe Touch
- Re: Protocol Definition Alessandro Vesely
- Re: Protocol Definition Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Protocol Definition Joe Touch
- Re: Protocol Definition Alessandro Vesely
- Re: Protocol Definition Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Protocol Definition Randy Bush
- Re: Protocol Definition Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Protocol Definition Joel jaeggli
- Re: Protocol Definition Melinda Shore
- Re: Protocol Definition Tony Finch
- Re: Protocol Definition Donald Eastlake
- Re: Protocol Definition tglassey