IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: ITU-T Dubai Meeting

Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com> Tue, 07 August 2012 15:23 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir@checkpoint.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3818021F86B8 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 08:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.221, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qTsDP7NLMWOm for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 08:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.checkpoint.com (smtp.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.68]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3A621F8608 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 08:23:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com (il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com [194.29.34.26]) by smtp.checkpoint.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q77FN1no019394; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:23:01 +0300
X-CheckPoint: {50212FFE-2-1B221DC2-4FFFF}
Received: from il-ex03.ad.checkpoint.com (194.29.34.71) by il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com (194.29.34.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:23:01 +0300
Received: from il-ex01.ad.checkpoint.com ([126.0.0.2]) by il-ex03.ad.checkpoint.com ([194.29.34.71]) with mapi; Tue, 7 Aug 2012 18:22:59 +0300
From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
To: Noel Chiappa <jnc@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 18:22:58 +0300
Subject: Re: ITU-T Dubai Meeting
Thread-Topic: ITU-T Dubai Meeting
Thread-Index: Ac10sIZz1GVkR8LHQkWXu751XGIUGQ==
Message-ID: <48BB64DC-B10D-458B-B108-B0AD5E61F99D@checkpoint.com>
References: <20120807151930.804E518C0B2@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20120807151930.804E518C0B2@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
x-kse-antivirus-interceptor-info: scan successful
x-kse-antivirus-info: Clean
x-cpdlp: 1152b4763592a1f4c019825139dc68eb09d1c55ff2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KSE-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: protection disabled
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Aug 2012 15:23:06 -0000

On Aug 7, 2012, at 6:19 PM, Noel Chiappa wrote:

>> From: Yoav Nir <ynir@checkpoint.com>
> 
>> For organizations renumbering is more painful, but as long as there's
>> plenty of time to prepare - it should be manageable. If it's too
>> painful, there are provider independent addresses, but how many really
>> need them?
> 
> Or we could separate location and identity. Just a thought. Oh, wait...

I'm the same person, I live in the same house. My computer is connected to the same socket in the wall. All I changed was the ISP. Why do we call the thing that's changed "location"?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email