Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate]

Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Fri, 13 February 2009 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 708AE3A6C6B for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:41:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BZHqJNOMt1uZ for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:41:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885293A6869 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:41:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.piuha.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B34198712 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:41:27 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by smtp.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0AE1986E2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:41:26 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <49959458.2040208@piuha.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:40:08 +0200
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Changes needed to Last Call boilerplate]
References: <49952C21.3070607@ripe.net>
In-Reply-To: <49952C21.3070607@ripe.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:41:22 -0000

Despite currently excessive number of comments, I think we should invite 
more comments and make it easier, not harder to send them. Even if 
traffic on the list is now too high and information content per message 
is low, in general our average number of comments in the IETF Last Call 
stage is too low.

I don't have a problem with the number of messages. Deleting is easy. 
But I wouldn't mind stricter enforcement of the Subject lines...

Note that this opinion is entirely separate from the value of the 
comments. Repetition and mail bombing is not valuable. Well justified 
opinions are very valuable. The latter may come from both inside and 
outside the IETF; sometimes experts on some topic can be persuaded to 
send in a comment, but not to subscribe to lists or engage in lengthy 
debate.

Jari