Re: Naive question on multiple TCP/IP channels
Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com> Thu, 05 February 2015 19:02 UTC
Return-Path: <wes@mti-systems.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E210B1A8A76 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:02:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1RPOtZ8UnXb5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:02:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from atl4mhob05.myregisteredsite.com (atl4mhob05.myregisteredsite.com [209.17.115.43]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B9B1A8A63 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 11:01:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailpod.hostingplatform.com ([10.30.71.205]) by atl4mhob05.myregisteredsite.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t15J1t3V019907 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 14:01:55 -0500
Received: (qmail 19880 invoked by uid 0); 5 Feb 2015 19:01:55 -0000
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.54.183.210
X-Authenticated-UID: wes@mti-systems.com
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.112?) (wes@mti-systems.com@207.54.183.210) by 0 with ESMTPA; 5 Feb 2015 19:01:55 -0000
Message-ID: <54D3BE1E.8010807@mti-systems.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 14:01:50 -0500
From: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
Organization: MTI Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Phillip Hallam-Baker <phill@hallambaker.com>, Jim Gettys <jg@freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: Naive question on multiple TCP/IP channels
References: <CAMm+Lwgb9L9bUG6ommBDYJzQTCU1cC_zLSEf_5JPeJ+c=yrYmA@mail.gmail.com> <5DF6DC77-E476-408F-9FA5-F107DDC9F857@netapp.com> <54D2B150.3020502@gmail.com> <CAMm+LwjQcX6xQSgEsiARFLtM5RGwyOtf19cxwph3g8X_9ON5ow@mail.gmail.com> <CAGhGL2A8mSWewGiCikyFQoRNuy9rwSdw2PuWPaHmMhBDEVBBJw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMm+Lwgo00dJFcLj-6wu=SuZ+gFbE8F79Tj75seN=Uk2c_vi6w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMm+Lwgo00dJFcLj-6wu=SuZ+gFbE8F79Tj75seN=Uk2c_vi6w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/kszbMWtvakMeOOVybkSnddhbCDY>
Cc: "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, IETF Discussion Mailing List <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 19:02:07 -0000
On 2/5/2015 11:51 AM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > > OK yes, My Netflix download is going to kill your VOIP call. > > Can't fix the queuing algorithm for just one interaction... > > > The reason I started pushing on this is that in the wake of Title II I > am expecting a lot of people to be asking me to explain how the Internet > worketh and this is precisely the sort of example that shows how (1) > things are more complex than they appear, (2) how some sort of > coordination is needed and (3) how the coordination needs to take less > than five years to come to a decision. > The AQM working group is attempting to do helpful things here, and could certainly use more feedback on some of the drafts: https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/aqm/documents/ *Please* feel welcomed to comment on the drafts, as part of the intention is to directly deal with the sorts of problems that have been mentioned in this thread. -- Wes Eddy MTI Systems
- Naive question on multiple TCP/IP channels Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Naive question on multiple TCP/IP channels Roberto Peon
- Re: Naive question on multiple TCP/IP channels Donald Eastlake
- Re: Naive question on multiple TCP/IP channels David Morris
- Re: Naive question on multiple TCP/IP channels Eggert, Lars
- Re: Naive question on multiple TCP/IP channels Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Naive question on multiple TCP/IP channels Christopher Morrow
- Re: Naive question on multiple TCP/IP channels Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Naive question on multiple TCP/IP channels Christopher Morrow
- Re: Naive question on multiple TCP/IP channels Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Naive question on multiple TCP/IP channels Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Naive question on multiple TCP/IP channels Martin Rex
- Re: Naive question on multiple TCP/IP channels Jim Gettys
- Re: Naive question on multiple TCP/IP channels Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Naive question on multiple TCP/IP channels Jim Gettys
- Re: Naive question on multiple TCP/IP channels Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [tsvwg] Naive question on multiple TCP/IP cha… Piers O'Hanlon
- Re: [tsvwg] Naive question on multiple TCP/IP cha… Jim Gettys
- Re: Naive question on multiple TCP/IP channels Wesley Eddy