Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca> Tue, 22 October 2013 18:18 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@iii.ca>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A0111E8209 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:18:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.639
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.639 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.040, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r3igSCR2+p05 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 191ED11E810B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:18:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.4.100] (unknown [128.107.239.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1368E22E257; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 14:18:05 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
Subject: Re: Proposed IETF Anti-Harassment Policy
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@iii.ca>
In-Reply-To: <151B3C7B-907C-494F-B5FA-2D70C93EF2B4@nominum.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:18:07 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <449D0548-324C-4377-B87E-B8B7ECDE92CB@iii.ca>
References: <B728B514-BC07-4D6E-899E-385C03C37430@ietf.org> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553BA6FB41@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <20131022093052.GF9517@thunk.org> <151B3C7B-907C-494F-B5FA-2D70C93EF2B4@nominum.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, "<ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 18:18:19 -0000

On Oct 22, 2013, at 8:15 AM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> What happened at PyCon is a really strong argument for having an escalation path other than twitter. 

+1