Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Thu, 02 April 2020 14:41 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 763AB3A13CB for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 07:41:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gEgG3DFj3GRg for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 07:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb36.google.com (mail-yb1-xb36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D6963A13E7 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2020 07:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb36.google.com with SMTP id g6so2235439ybh.12 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 07:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=YaB0SllHikiM1oEzH0NTAb5Rvjo1U1EyPPGZa2m1Yd8=; b=bP6AMNFIdwhkE5YEddT1NE/MpoghPsnEWPGjy20Lm/GMZ6DhaAI9e1Smi9tXR+ww4D 9JDkgigPDM+SMK20377UuhY4jC59uvhtPIE5Reu/is7/h4KB0e+OJGK6r7G1Y7f58m8J SKrLjTc80wQKrWpkbL5eyJ8AquFSKFF9OF+n0iygL/y2N5Q4Zeqt/uHrC2ADIliRurdt gyay5+fyah72AvNY5cMKUNjP9FexJPZYIasC4phpOwNFrmDg7NUJdN14gb0ALP4qL5FU 29N/zawGkblwiJJEVVZdQc3N3mQEejMvpxzzcHEGUcVqca+nUkGm7MP2en6yeuYo/Ck8 fD/A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=YaB0SllHikiM1oEzH0NTAb5Rvjo1U1EyPPGZa2m1Yd8=; b=DrMsk9iSSUtWvhWt4VyJqILSkQsi5M0DOoeESYIB0goSSGjcFGl8FYhvrvxCf8XM1B 2nmXSLw70qmsLXMtqlyvPcGWHSj2ooxEbMaX++BXrsK2WDWEQbxOXFuF4cBhkXyXQGh3 l48spwkrrknNMyRPh8vOkTtGqZssXGLQMPO86cNy6LHCtZpoeEuwzz+p1lNUm+/M4R2e 233Gi3jOvxwoiqwHbJpZXvJsMfpcsp3smT5LHpMIZmXUwxnsUVNqvl5W+z1jfHbVGgLb 9mnLQcANuX/Mk/G6nS28M1eYTidV5H9FB+lIwknoO6NNuLqqSm0Nk83055xFftFNfSqd HGlw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubgFlxLcVfejpZxAayiA0VIArQL3OoPm8IFCSU/8pMUb+vfVogB c+nZEw9o+CnONIyD66ZlFoPhMiTzkp92oqfzaNKB+rak
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypI7hvIce6xODxRHc8ULRxp/zVhlOZ7Z3jRYJJFZl+ozU5mAc+Uv68uI+NIsCBzG77mL3AH/MEoXpDUHfO45gEU=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:bb4f:: with SMTP id b15mr6288693ybk.175.1585838479357; Thu, 02 Apr 2020 07:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALaySJ+kFVXrVAkYLaO6MaPqDA29MzXhVFcxG0c6hZcBs-LqnQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVAhfFLYwzqw6Qch3BpuMvqjZPzFJ5o1iTOwR+yqH8j-Aw@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCzMPGuunYZBCSh90ddY2kKJ_Hqnot0s1jmhNQ7qT0xkg@mail.gmail.com> <89730DD8-0451-4658-A0CD-83A85E2055FE@episteme.net> <0C31D020-46FA-424E-8FFD-64BBE8F952E9@cooperw.in> <1E702B62-9982-48F2-B8D6-F4F80A8DE168@episteme.net> <20200331184236.GT18021@localhost> <CALaySJ+_+-kf+3nta8LwMiwPmqPmRdOgC7KAnDfeDgx0ThVa-w@mail.gmail.com> <CALaySJ+27gcT6x5BcKU1YHHv+xeaXDnxPU0yhtBSULb36VpFWA@mail.gmail.com> <13677.1585772383@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <13677.1585772383@localhost>
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 09:41:08 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcdHwA8wPfQeF-b5ZOFPXhAz_PSku7+uwUxZ9AVVVhHXeA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: NomCom eligibility & IETF 107
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003bbc7605a24fcbc7"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/kw4r3Xj7iVJ6uStAVA-__lDXsU8>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2020 14:41:27 -0000

On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 3:20 PM Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
wrote:

>
> Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> wrote:
>     > THIS NOMCOM CYCLE ONLY and SETTING NO PRECEDENT, I would replace the
>     > first two paragraphs this way:
>
> ....
>
>     > The question I will ask is this: Is there anyone who *can't live with
>     > that outcome*?
>
> I can live with this.
>
> {I think that the impact is very small, and might even be zero.
> I intend to try to determine the numbers exactly.
> Having the Bluesheets entered from last week would help some scenarios.}
>
>

I agree. Why not include IETF 107?

Regards,
Behcet

> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
>
>