Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes)

SM <> Sun, 02 December 2012 09:16 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A2921F887D for <>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 01:16:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.662
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.662 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.062, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xb0B8WOqG9lA for <>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 01:16:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6FA21F887C for <>; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 01:16:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (IDENT:sm@localhost []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qB29Fwev010346; Sun, 2 Dec 2012 01:16:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail2010; t=1354439762; bh=tceaFw06aaVvcbBRe1JZH16Rb4K2qG4Uxw9N3RRJLLY=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=lcY5rPy+N8eihGwBequwgtt0xSO7zHRF6Ea/BOMKth0Ezs37HKg44ltGlTBB9WGQg XKigHKFBjmYlqNpYaRH2HLzN00a/rHgmLm+3xbGsciehCn06Ss31P8r5YzNhdrdsWk pVx7TwSXy81z0Ds5QeRkkDukaow1I0RF7R0gAM0Y=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple;; s=mail; t=1354439762;; bh=tceaFw06aaVvcbBRe1JZH16Rb4K2qG4Uxw9N3RRJLLY=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=HqG4ati9Z0QMLlFk7cK3oAq3xERZ9lybcxt7NoCPMOGHtmz8eAuSqGhEuH2dYBcKh mwqFycU4mgm6DGa1y4W+o5KQmzlrAML9a/aLcENQ28HpP7tA/gHBLhWp5RDP/UN7Y9 zTR5lvf4ZcteF0pqk3Ljky5ejEbS8POuXsSKQwTg=
Message-Id: <>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 01:01:22 -0800
To: Melinda Shore <>
From: SM <>
Subject: Re: PowerPoint considered harmful (was Re: Barely literate minutes)
In-Reply-To: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <00c001cdce7a$d9fa6490$8def2db0$> <> <> <> <> <>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2012 09:16:12 -0000

Hi Melinda,
At 22:29 01-12-2012, Melinda Shore wrote:
>Not really sure what can be done about this - you can say "discussion,
>not presentation" until you're blue in the face and the outcome of all
>that will be a blue face but presentations during the meetings anyway.
>Ultimately I expect it comes down to how individual chairs want to
>run meetings.


Powerpoint is intended 'for interpretation by a program that 
understands the data on the recipient's system.  Recipients need to 
understand that they are at the "mercy" of the sender, when receiving 
this type of data, since data will be executed on their system, and 
the security of their machines can be violated' [1].

These powerpoint presentations are good enough to keep people 
entertained for the duration of the session.  They mask the fact that 
there hasn't been any discussion of the issues on a mailing 
list.  Pete Resnick mentioned that "doing document reviews in 
presentation form where the editor is the one doing the slides has 
created this problem" [2].  This comes down to "we have seen others 
doing it and that's why we do it".