Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy

"John Levine" <johnl@taugh.com> Sun, 22 July 2012 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D9721F863E for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 08:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -111.129
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-111.129 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.070, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED=-4.3, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C81Z0vbsdM2q for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 08:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from leila.iecc.com (leila6.iecc.com [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:4c:6569:6c61]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B57021F863B for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 22 Jul 2012 08:30:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 78305 invoked from network); 22 Jul 2012 15:31:41 -0000
Received: from leila.iecc.com (64.57.183.34) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 22 Jul 2012 15:31:41 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=500c1cdd.xn--9vv.k1207; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=zZH5BR+nmb8LKdUpdHq8FQvDfJsAfes6evQgwCRUepQ=; b=Vh0YFBasY8mWSGI3Sy+09ugHix6s3wz0xGHyuPcmVFfu0sKt1EzaPyCJjeA6GXvmJEHCyPFd48YBwQXtcAHbgxCBGEPV8SVVUS0IuSVRdT1u+BRjZIrAuQ2EKP2zP7HxxmN3UicIAqwzABjINL3eg8EXA5S0Tw8gFkM/pt8FR1I=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=taugh.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:vbr-info; s=500c1cdd.xn--9vv.k1207; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=zZH5BR+nmb8LKdUpdHq8FQvDfJsAfes6evQgwCRUepQ=; b=Wi8wvjjzztEMRQ7GmnP6R/w/o0lG2UCWahayIN0b/T2/N4PBn4sBQMUA6FNYRwLqhshaZXOW+E2j/M3i274VM0ghnRlmJAg99rWun5DcRKM7LCaNBQ8HHkZt0bsbZ4Mv2WutRoEJv5XzzaJ69AZu5O6yRns/TJTUi2qFX2NQ/QE=
VBR-Info: md=iecc.com; mc=all; mv=dwl.spamhaus.org
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 15:31:18 -0000
Message-ID: <20120722153118.60473.qmail@joyce.lan>
From: John Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [IAOC] Feedback Requested on Draft Fees Policy
In-Reply-To: <CAJNg7VKqbdXeFXCe6iBRPe=X89q4NuSVcgvmc+C=t0826HRwiA@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 15:30:42 -0000

> Yes, we typically then point out that much of what they want is
> available on line, and frequently negotiate with opposing counsel to
> moderate demands for depositions, etc., but, in the end, we propose,
> the judge and opposing counsel dispose. That won't change.

I'd want to set the depo rate high enough that if someone has to be
deposed, he or she will at least feel that the money makes up for
the hassle.

For people with unique skills or knowledge, $800/hr is not unusual.
So long as the rate is published ahead of time, you're not going to
get much argument.  ("Yes, we know it's high.  But we've already told
you how to download stuff yourself for free.")

R's,
John