IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Hotel situation

Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us> Wed, 06 January 2016 23:38 UTC

Return-Path: <richard@shockey.us>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B1F21A1BE6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 15:38:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7qVz_OYwx_xH for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 15:38:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (qproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [66.147.248.250]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 338051A1A90 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Jan 2016 15:38:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 16324 invoked by uid 0); 6 Jan 2016 23:38:11 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw2) (10.0.90.83) by qproxy4.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 6 Jan 2016 23:38:11 -0000
Received: from box462.bluehost.com ([74.220.219.62]) by cmgw2 with id 2nJ31s0061MNPNq01nJ6J6; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 16:18:10 -0700
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=dqRIVTQ4 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=jTEj1adHphCQ5SwrTAOQMg==:117 a=jTEj1adHphCQ5SwrTAOQMg==:17 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=f5113yIGAAAA:8 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=MKtGQD3n3ToA:10 a=1oJP67jkp3AA:10 a=ZZnuYtJkoWoA:10 a=8WrITzYgnNwA:10 a=p-_XEfp0GhYA:10 a=7aQ_Q-yQQ-AA:10 a=jqBRFv0mrdUA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=No5EcEP4AAAA:8 a=ORICRina5XoH8Acyc9QA:9 a=LR54ZCcMW7qVbCXy:21 a=3r2FflK6onaBL8_-:21 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=shockey.us; s=default; h=Content-transfer-encoding:Content-type:Mime-version:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:CC:To:From:Subject:Date; bh=vwM2PDUKqOf19yQ9NHMTvAv1sD0ie6PpJk+sMRkbQ1U=; b=L6D4GmfniYh8HBCok+RbTQadgWdUUZZGbDFr0b19C2N1lbkILFcM1ENPkmWT90DBia4ZiCeKwjYs+D0kz0sZmcvQ+esZE4pGhLml1DCIdw9NIbiu+TK40Xh9ii/nDeby;
Received: from [100.36.35.60] (port=65516 helo=[192.168.1.9]) by box462.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from <richard@shockey.us>) id 1aGxLA-0005D2-KK; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 16:18:04 -0700
User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.151217
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 18:17:57 -0500
Subject: Re: Hotel situation
From: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <79A3EA98-D058-47EC-8F85-3A6B9CBD5D39@shockey.us>
Thread-Topic: Hotel situation
References: <567192F3.9090506@gmail.com> <8D23D4052ABE7A4490E77B1A012B630797A09BC1@mbx-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM> <48E1A67CB9CA044EADFEAB87D814BFF6449900E0@eusaamb107.ericsson.se> <CABmDk8n2TFvmoMVa8t3FOGXtKF9GUii=wrEyMpJucAoLzCix1Q@mail.gmail.com> <346B0259-F6BD-4207-988F-950D6C03F7FD@piuha.net> <02ac01d1486a$d0c41660$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <E364AC68-AAF7-4E7C-BD66-794D032A52CE@gmail.com> <m2fuyajoqf.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2fuyajoqf.wl%randy@psg.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
X-Identified-User: {3286:box462.bluehost.com:shockeyu:shockey.us} {sentby:smtp auth 100.36.35.60 authed with richard+shockey.us}
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/l6EX5pdKQwBzeJCCScbugTfNf_s>
Cc: IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Jan 2016 23:38:15 -0000

Vegas .. Sure you can negotiate reasonable room rates for a block as large excellent direct connections as our and goodness knows the food is superb.

I’d add barbecue to the list of possible matrix of requirements. That adds Kansas City and Austin TX Memphis and Charlotte NC to the mix and they are not as cold as Minneapolis. 

Germany does actually meet the requirements. Schweinshaxe is one of the glories of German/Austrian civilization. 

Quebec of course for all things Duck.

Actually that should be the first requirement.  “Yes dear ..what are you hungry for?”  



—





On 1/6/16, 6:02 PM, "ietf on behalf of Randy Bush" <ietf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of randy@psg.com> wrote:

>> Avoid places like Las Vegas and Macau
>
>why?  vegas seems an ok us venue.  maybe tacky, but we're not so high
>society ourselves.
>
>and places such as KL / petaling jaya have great facilities, are easy to
>reach, are cheap, and make most visas easy.
>
>randy
>

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status