IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF chair's blog

Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> Mon, 25 February 2013 06:57 UTC

Return-Path: <aservin@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE22921F91E5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 22:57:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r7nz6K00Us-K for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 22:57:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEDC721F91E1 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 22:56:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from minir2d2.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:df9:0:4017:e42c:c034:61ed:fff8]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3465308424; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 04:56:31 -0200 (UYST)
Message-ID: <512B0B20.2000403@lacnic.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:56:32 +0800
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130216 Thunderbird/17.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
Subject: Re: IETF chair's blog
References: <1BBAE003-DEA4-462A-998D-863F6FF90A69@ietf.org> <51298B1E.60007@lacnic.net> <512A5A10.4090406@acm.org> <8A832DDC-1D5E-4C1B-87BB-36A384937480@lacnic.net> <512B0A2D.3050102@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <512B0A2D.3050102@acm.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 06:57:05 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256


	Yes, I correct, I meant to outreach and not collaborate.

	If it were to collaborate, an ietf application with open standards
should be the way forward.

	For outreach my opinion is that does not matter.

Regards,
as

On 25/02/2013 14:52, Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote:
> On 02/24/2013 05:21 PM, Arturo Servin wrote:
> 
>> Why not?
> 
>> I, my organization and many more (included ISOC) have found them
>> very useful for outreach activities. I do not see why the IETF
>> shouldn't. Please, tell me.
> 
> You said collaborate below, now you are saying outreach.  What I
> said was specifically about collaboration.
> 
> 
> 
>> as
> 
>> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On 25 Feb 2013, at 02:21, Marc Petit-Huguenin <petithug@acm.org>
>> wrote:
> 
>> On 02/23/2013 07:38 PM, Arturo Servin wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Very good initiative.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Twitter, Google+, Facebook, etc. could be the next steps.
>>>>> Let's embrace new tools to collaborate.
> 
>> Let's not.  Collaboration based on software running on servers
>> run by the IETF or a contractor payed by the IETF is fine.  Using
>> collaboration tools owned by the entities you listed, or similar
>> entities, is not.
> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards, as
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 22/02/2013 20:35, IETF Chair wrote:
>>>>>> Jari has created a blog as an experiment to see if would
>>>>>> be possible to provide periodic status reports and other
>>>>>> thoughts from the chair. Here's the link:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> http://www.ietf.org/blog/2013/02/chairs-blog/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iF4EAREIAAYFAlErCx8ACgkQr8mvgVZWPgmfCQD/dupspw+Jh/PB7E+wHEALBSyJ
EOJA8t63U+NkFZgv7GcA/jwXf6NQuPajpCGiERB/zsqJJiy3jurIIC17Ofv1/yZM
=N8V+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status