IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Sergeant-at-arms engagement model

Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> Tue, 15 October 2019 07:10 UTC

Return-Path: <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC41D12004F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2lf6uvQjMVX0 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp [131.112.32.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E6185120041 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 00:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 17634 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2019 06:57:12 -0000
Received: from necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (131.112.32.132) by necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp with SMTP; 15 Oct 2019 06:57:12 -0000
Subject: Re: Sergeant-at-arms engagement model
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <9CC87E00-FFFD-44C1-ABD8-ED69C07F4561@ietf.org> <bd74243b-0844-0040-9d17-8cdb7c117304@network-heretics.com>
From: Masataka Ohta <mohta@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Message-ID: <edbd49e0-5937-8044-6508-c8cbdebf97b8@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 16:10:28 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <bd74243b-0844-0040-9d17-8cdb7c117304@network-heretics.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/lBs5-1u3asjocT56PoQEdnv1m2g>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 07:10:35 -0000

Keith Moore wrote:

> The words "They also include criticizing an idea in an insulting or 
> excessively hostile manner" are troubling.   I realize that one may 
> criticize an idea in such a way as to effectively be critical of the
>  person proposing the idea.  And yet, it is essential that people be
> able to discuss ideas candidly, and sometimes to criticize ideas 
> emphatically.   I believe it's inappropriate to impugn a
> participant's motive without supporting evidence of that motive.  But
> I don't believe it's wrong to point out any problem with an idea
> itself, nor with potential ill effects of an idea, nor even with the
> appearance of an idea.   Sometimes this is a fine line, but it's
> essential that the SAAs not interfere with vigorous discussion of
> relevant ideas.

Let me try.

IPv6 with unnecessarily lengthy 16B addresses without valid
technical reasoning only to make network operations prohibitively
painful is a garbage protocol.

LISP, which perform ID to locator mapping, which is best
performed by DNS, in a lot less scalable way than DNS
is a garbage protocol.

					Masataka Ohta

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email