Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?

Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> Mon, 30 January 2017 12:42 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C3812942F for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 04:42:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yLheYbM8vgl6 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 04:42:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf0-x234.google.com (mail-lf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41F9E12945D for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 04:42:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id n124so193265565lfd.2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 04:42:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnt-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=K3QUBNWl+qKmsrDbWD9xdJxNK86w/EHyFTPSUXm9kKo=; b=cniBDluHCLE6vpR47sKm/JrroTbG8TvLbow/ebRIjJ9/AzmOTf7JrAUKwA41Z5eX9k pLpZix+YlY1H2TBHVYCT9rHGjkvr86C+K+435cbPeQSWUI8Z2IVNk1SK/nS1Hqkz1p+X 7nq5mdd3YPudwNqBLlpAmiiPFeGREbA4W80rLlaiBvGhjLs1i9EjrOQAyvdHYbT2Iadw IRuCAHW6PWuDSwjbUjqZWX2gLj973SfaQNutbFKnJDMp6LlsFbYHODQq1FRJjkdNK3d5 pmVALk3RZMhl9HyQ8jlNWeGTDO/za7ttAG/5OpNfpVPt5Z5onQ23FUblRirK+MEIHBr7 Ck6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=K3QUBNWl+qKmsrDbWD9xdJxNK86w/EHyFTPSUXm9kKo=; b=mEuDJH5OV91mTriXescEUFyup8bMqT42n/U96BPjkvMHADVRHOfSHFMdTDDMrbqAa/ C4rqyEpI4e9OB42QWFqEwfowLWXrfFVsVqZjj6ZxlmJ+Y7eRlB8KdL0RvdlQ0oBSXtMp KtBxKgaTxazp6loUPbFrsADcXuSy3kCse9ysOUlZKkZZr49G73yXms0mucjLZtHV1azT tuRiKDqjGxC6hk48oKzvgCSgm/JDBovhf/1tSbBPJOwL1QcWkkFsDXRcMDdtI1zCBRnf BnWyzb+CC91Go7+TwaMiogk2d7tbniu/4ySvbb5JmL0LgfMX2UOwqSYGX8iof9bKEbUS nf2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKiRh88RJl1d+TP8V+X+EtA9sgfz+EDkpxFjLW0wpn8IrE43VnlXskTzTIzu48w5A==
X-Received: by 10.46.22.81 with SMTP id 17mr975470ljw.13.1485780170426; Mon, 30 Jan 2017 04:42:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:6b0:7:1:6863:458d:b297:9108? ([2001:6b0:7:1:6863:458d:b297:9108]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c18sm3688194ljb.8.2017.01.30.04.42.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 30 Jan 2017 04:42:49 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: If Muslims are blocked by the U.S., should the IETF respond?
To: Dave Cridland <dave@cridland.net>
References: <CAEjQQ5Vjs-vg6UQ9Oy0kb8VNEZHTbZnyHxeTCqVwPg4MjErsqA@mail.gmail.com> <6d5f47e2-ac98-f71a-a9cc-1b01cb972db0@mnt.se> <CAKHUCzz_6W5OoejQis-i7s1OtZA6rDFhmKiMv38YHbue9za6CQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
Message-ID: <80ed33bb-8f73-7f78-2577-a8c353c50bb4@mnt.se>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 13:42:48 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKHUCzz_6W5OoejQis-i7s1OtZA6rDFhmKiMv38YHbue9za6CQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/lDlNf8-fXFh-xFbaiRN2TaHWuaU>
Cc: "ietf@ietf.org Discussion" <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 12:42:53 -0000

> Holding meetings exclusively outside the US means that anyone living
> in the US under a green card or similar may well not be able to return
> from such a meeting.

Those people work for companies in whose self-interest it is to allow
them to participate (presumably). $ talks.