IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Wed, 21 August 2013 11:33 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B98111E820C for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 04:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.391
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.391 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.092, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n2foImvtV50c for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 04:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ams-iport-3.cisco.com (ams-iport-3.cisco.com [144.254.224.146]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FCE11E81FD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 04:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=592; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1377084824; x=1378294424; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=dmfBT6U0hPZELzit8GlzR8R3K51hMZYo75khTlGyrBU=; b=k/02MecpnAftOxqmPOrcESw6w329MEHicbq2V+z94WOJcj8wzyVMV27l S9YKeoV0nF3+1K3HzMsn85DcOtv/axCyzfzDmSgmfOKN0MFEd8yG9qDEU YBCQWQqrzjlD8XzPZ0IsolAtm+LEkPT1a82J0k4JvbHuC/QtZeTuzaVam 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnUFAHOkFFKQ/khM/2dsb2JhbABbgwWDWUe8P4EiFnSCJAEBAQQjDwFFARALGAICBRYEBwICCQMCAQIBRQYNAQUCAQGIDKMWinOBKY1jgUkHgmiBLAOXZZFWgWGBPTqBNQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,927,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="16882556"
Received: from ams-core-3.cisco.com ([144.254.72.76]) by ams-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 21 Aug 2013 11:33:43 +0000
Received: from ams3-vpn-dhcp4704.cisco.com (ams3-vpn-dhcp4704.cisco.com [10.61.82.95]) by ams-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7LBXdXk009921 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:33:40 GMT
Message-ID: <5214A593.8030907@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:33:39 +0200
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Patrik Fältström <paf@frobbit.se>
Subject: Re: [spfbis] Last Call: <draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-19.txt> (Sender Policy Framework (SPF) for Authorizing Use of Domains in Email, Version 1) to Proposed Standard
References: <20130819150521.GB21088@besserwisser.org> <20130819160549.61542.qmail@joyce.lan> <20130819190533.GA30516@besserwisser.org> <4751241.GTNxysAlzm@scott-latitude-e6320> <B443E973-858A-4958-964B-B0F0FBDF5A7A@virtualized.org> <CAMm+LwhcHOeUv0iqZmZ6wX-jOD1r-mRR0x8sbxaKrsU3k4CNBQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130821040003.GL607@mx1.yitter.info> <64700EE4-85B3-4179-904A-885770C6BBF4@virtualized.org> <7F8D4DA5-F80B-432B-8231-5B40ADB61783@frobbit.se> <521495EB.7060207@cisco.com> <1C40FB10-3705-4E80-8DEB-D14B63D24C97@frobbit.se>
In-Reply-To: <1C40FB10-3705-4E80-8DEB-D14B63D24C97@frobbit.se>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:33:48 -0000

So your point is that their conclusions that nobody has the record
installed is false?

Eliot

On 8/21/13 12:42 PM, Patrik Fältström wrote:
> On 21 aug 2013, at 12:26, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>> The easy part was supposed to be people actually using the SPF record, once it was out there.  And so your data doesn't indicate what sort of answers you're getting.
> These are logs on one of my authoritative servers, and the queries you see are the queries sent _TO_ the server. So of course I also have the responses I give to the one those queries.
>
>    Patrik
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email