Re: eating our own dogfood...Re: IPv4 Outage

Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU> Tue, 18 December 2007 22:05 UTC

Return-path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4kZR-0004tw-IF; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:05:49 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4kZQ-0004tm-Al for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:05:48 -0500
Received: from boreas.isi.edu ([128.9.160.161]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J4kZP-0000GE-VV for ietf@ietf.org; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:05:48 -0500
Received: from boreas.isi.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id lBIM55fo004465 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:05:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from bmanning@localhost) by boreas.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id lBIM55Yk004464; Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:05:05 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 14:05:05 -0800
From: Bill Manning <bmanning@ISI.EDU>
To: Frank Ellermann <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20071218220505.GA28386@boreas.isi.edu>
References: <20071218203617.GA2167@boreas.isi.edu> <fk9cus$bju$1@ger.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <fk9cus$bju$1@ger.gmane.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: bmanning@boreas.isi.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8abaac9e10c826e8252866cbe6766464
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: eating our own dogfood...Re: IPv4 Outage
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On Tue, Dec 18, 2007 at 10:09:28PM +0100, Frank Ellermann wrote:
> Bill Manning wrote:
> 
> > as offical spokesmodel for the IETF in your role 
> > as Sgt at Arms, your you SURE you want to advocate
> > the IETF abandon its published statement wrt there 
> > being ONE ROOT ...
> 
> Our interpretation of "a sergeant-at-arms appointed by the
> Chair is empowered to restrict posting by a person, or of
> a thread, when the content is inappropriate and represents
> a pattern of abuse" is apparently different, I don't see
> an "official spokesmodel" in RFC 3005.  
> 
> I've no idea who is a sergeant-at-arms here at the moment,
> and Ted certainly didn't post in this role.  Correct me
> if I'm wrong, "one root" is an IAB doctrine, isn't it ?
> Did the IETF ever bother to confirm it ?
> 
>  Frank
> 
	my appologies to Ted, you happend to be the nearest 
	lighting rod.

	Frank, to your question.   RFC 3245 section 2.2


--bill

Opinions expressed may not even be mine by the time you read them, and
certainly don't reflect those of any other entity (legal or otherwise).


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf