IETF Logo Mail Archive

Attendee lists in proceedings [Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal]

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 05 April 2008 03:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietf-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-ietf-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EFA228C181; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:51:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287DA28C193 for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:51:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.691
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.691 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.908, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lCcSF702psWg for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:51:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.181]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9F628C181 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Apr 2008 20:51:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k40so314977wah.25 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y8y/u1Fq4e1ojTlcF8FZ5LlVBuxtbT+KZeXHGpRsGpI=; b=pL9+3FUE3Etp7qLS/6UUJS7x31Z6mJkhZ3u8vAQl5zz3Pd+gUWpmXvSWfh7EfgVz2MCnu1FmEXteSS7scmpqRlMF0QAa5QFhVuzYb7VXIR+o4D9fQPZIGBpeAKqpnBCszng7QcC8o8WjDyO01WVuG3kLs/lxOWw7l1QOSpyoBws=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AvbG+7/NgP9nC3DLvbnOM8kmFLvqYAdBlVk7o4T0z/FiALJOvNaqvECB16m/Q5n4YUCgEheUYn8rCwx0bSLh7G9yg3Pq0xKmGcNuIKU0aqpXt/Q1L3aPl4cx0pRZkBIx/cpQT1foeGiMbTt/7gnEGpwIwFurCv/JqdxgLv9uHgE=
Received: by 10.114.195.19 with SMTP id s19mr3257342waf.57.1207367501862; Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?10.1.1.4? ( [118.92.144.223]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n22sm8720842pof.13.2008.04.04.20.51.40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 04 Apr 2008 20:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <47F6F747.8040302@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 16:51:35 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dave Crocker <dhc2@dcrocker.net>
Subject: Attendee lists in proceedings [Re: Blue Sheet Change Proposal]
References: <C41ABF2B.198EB%eburger@bea.com> <47F5ADE0.6060300@dcrocker.net> <E6C2E8958BA59A4FB960963D475F7AC30BCBDE8243@mail.acmepacket.com> <47F5E338.3000809@dcrocker.net>
In-Reply-To: <47F5E338.3000809@dcrocker.net>
Cc: IETF Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ietf-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ietf-bounces@ietf.org

On 2008-04-04 21:13, Dave Crocker wrote:
...
> As for the reported use of the lists for spam, they need not be included in the
> proceedings.

email addresses were dropped from the proceedings years ago for
that reason.

> Hadn't thought about it before, but I'm not seeing why attendee
> lists are particularly useful for the Proceedings.

Because an open standards process probably shouldn't be
conducted anonymously as far as the general public is concerned?

   Brian
_______________________________________________
IETF mailing list
IETF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email