IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09

Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au> Wed, 10 December 2014 00:52 UTC

Return-Path: <phluid61@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67BDA1A036E; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:52:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.027
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.027 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Nw-56jyKOSj; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:52:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qc0-x234.google.com (mail-qc0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E453A1A0250; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:52:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id i8so1406558qcq.39 for <multiple recipients>; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:52:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=IAr4DihUJ7AQrV/5HSVg4ha6SUxzhH8qEGMQgn5DLnA=; b=guf66gJwUy2/udDBxNULC2MWlVR4hvG7i+uHjRbwoox+buzP0K5NeOP9Ih6k/Cu1c+ mW6uV3ncZWqXelWdKtIiNC//QUZAHiamCySacXe9Kkwy50e5GXGDuHojHUXybtPazKFV R2xp5Xh1HYDxSS6UuVtcRyCKXeZNqP93c4A7/vjEbCac+w/Gbe8CQszs9GK91jTk5iDG Cktf7aAzUaXEKyQSfo39i7teL5Ib43QBTFlkKJuU0BcTQEJKwPlaIR6++YxvpXKxnuf8 r9HJu3cObOLLnuiAwtV/gTrukt1FxrlvffuzvgApCKbiqBn6CnfNNoubY/Qk7/ZPd58P Lpsw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.106.35 with SMTP id d32mr2864633qgf.48.1418172742173; Tue, 09 Dec 2014 16:52:22 -0800 (PST)
Sender: phluid61@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.86.163 with HTTP; Tue, 9 Dec 2014 16:52:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20141210004925.GQ12979@localhost>
References: <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D24327794936289DC7@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com> <20141209041937.GD11221@localhost> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362AE54B@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com> <20141209171724.GB12979@localhost> <CE03DB3D7B45C245BCA0D243277949362AE8A0@MX104CL02.corp.emc.com> <20141210004925.GQ12979@localhost>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 10:52:22 +1000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: koIG0QtbE1HIGVuTC4AVB7CRnVc
Message-ID: <CACweHNAtbxVOsnGAPsRJQD=640hzvpxYh5L34kZYQjsOO6H8HA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Gen-ART and OPS-Dir review of draft-ietf-json-text-sequence-09
From: Matthew Kerwin <matthew@kerwin.net.au>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113b45588709380509d21217"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/lNTl1flmBZpnuQyr1kfh8bZSTsY
Cc: "General Area Review Team (gen-art@ietf.org)" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "json@ietf.org" <json@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 00:52:25 -0000

On 10 December 2014 at 10:49, Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> wrote:

>
> (yes, I think this should be a 'should', not a 'SHOULD').
>
>
​Not an 'ought to'?​


-- 
  Matthew Kerwin
  http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email