IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Proposed New Note Well

Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org> Tue, 22 March 2016 01:59 UTC

Return-Path: <stewe@stewe.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D971E12D0E1 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q7dYsZP9UO8M for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:59:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0749.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:749]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99E4D12D117 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:59:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLUPR17MB0275.namprd17.prod.outlook.com (10.162.235.146) by BLUPR17MB0275.namprd17.prod.outlook.com (10.162.235.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.443.12; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 01:58:48 +0000
Received: from BLUPR17MB0275.namprd17.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.235.146]) by BLUPR17MB0275.namprd17.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.235.146]) with mapi id 15.01.0443.014; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 01:58:48 +0000
From: Stephan Wenger <stewe@stewe.org>
To: "lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk" <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Proposed New Note Well
Thread-Topic: Proposed New Note Well
Thread-Index: AQHRg5IBbPPvEjzjx0GQYqlrtT4d5J9kqVQAgAALuYD//4s0gA==
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 01:58:48 +0000
Message-ID: <4B03F1C2-8482-4428-8FC2-0AA0C3BEE384@stewe.org>
References: <56F09C8C.4060104@gmail.com> <2061005430.4387801.1458611809564.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <2061005430.4387801.1458611809564.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: yahoo.co.uk; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;yahoo.co.uk; dmarc=none action=none header.from=stewe.org;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [50.174.30.183]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f93bdabf-b68c-4fc9-35ea-08d351f58282
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR17MB0275; 5:RoDWCt4Y9DE7BkG6f1JyFXMZtpkLCxeFICvuNRtnh0/V//Wk6H6sxPrJAksRu1QJ4EMPVFjgp6ApPyI/mewA4bFV2at3iwrGb7R1XpLsYutJeBXBv3XHcFSAKuX8ono9Ap5tzpyHMw6ZmqOP4dKhPg==; 24:ME1QDY5cEYi4t966EcpkvGTuJPwy+wNAjPFC1AlwqYkbva4momb3sjicR76UQLezTcCvsjqCE9Msxn+LvlUzfMf0hUqMJWcsf+Xju/I7Xz4=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR17MB0275;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR17MB027506B1644567A035C643F1AE800@BLUPR17MB0275.namprd17.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040046)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001)(6041046)(6043046); SRVR:BLUPR17MB0275; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR17MB0275;
x-forefront-prvs: 08897B549D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(15395725005)(16236675004)(2501003)(11100500001)(5001770100001)(10400500002)(50986999)(5008740100001)(33656002)(83716003)(189998001)(19617315012)(107886002)(106116001)(99286002)(76176999)(54356999)(15198665003)(122556002)(82746002)(5002640100001)(2950100001)(2900100001)(5004730100002)(3660700001)(86362001)(2906002)(3280700002)(92566002)(3480700003)(3846002)(15975445007)(2521001)(36756003)(77096005)(19580405001)(19580395003)(586003)(1096002)(1220700001)(87936001)(66066001)(81166005)(102836003)(6116002)(24704002)(42262002)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR17MB0275; H:BLUPR17MB0275.namprd17.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4B03F1C2848244288FC20AA0C3BEE384steweorg_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: stewe.org
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Mar 2016 01:58:48.5591 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 865fc51c-5fae-4322-98ef-0121a85df0b6
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR17MB0275
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/lOwCY2CZyhtEWguEV8KNBanpkDY>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 01:59:11 -0000

The disclosure obligation is personal, by design.  Whether you consider this good or bad depends on your viewpoint…
Stephan

From: ietf <ietf-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ietf-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of "lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk<mailto:lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>" <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk<mailto:lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>>
Reply-To: "lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk<mailto:lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>" <lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk<mailto:lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk>>
Date: Monday, March 21, 2016 at 18:56
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com<mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>>, "ietf@ietf.org<mailto:ietf@ietf.org>" <ietf@ietf.org<mailto:ietf@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: Proposed New Note Well

What about participating in the IETF by proxy,
which is what corporations do?


Lloyd Wood lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk<mailto:lloyd.wood@yahoo.co.uk> http://about.me/lloydwood


________________________________
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com<mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>>
To: ietf@ietf.org<mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
Sent: Tuesday, 22 March 2016, 12:14
Subject: Re: Proposed New Note Well

Hi,

I could live with this, although I am still happy enough with the old version.

> By participating in the IETF,

I think this should say

By participating in the IETF in person, remotely, or on-line,

> ​BCP 25 (Working Group processes)
> BCP 25 (Anti-Harassment Procedures)

Why two separate lines, when BCP 9 (6 different RFCs) only gets one line?

Regards
  Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email