IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Oauth blog post

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com> Thu, 02 August 2012 16:05 UTC

Return-Path: <superuser@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B7821F8602 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:05:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.662
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.662 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.064, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5LUqsfEiSmjo for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:05:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37A821F85EF for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:05:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so5660776lag.31 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 09:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=RQv6KOQDZgkdE5HFZiLHaWktza3crNVS7oULGFGivkY=; b=LyLDMjohHlmL+otMEEHevTjvV4o0p/y50/4nuGO/tmLuz3T0Q3N8gZ12dZtygW49yQ RlLSUpAm1H2enYg1ZJz/W8DVdJcS/NgESN4m0YEz5dDK9uGorfsOHRIw5dNjmuf1t/fl +6x77+12kxOkB4IyW5vOe8kqT+NQfVzXa0Ggs3nxt+n66O5r0dOhhQq7FpNfBrTGMkQl CC2TUTeaajStfF3NgeZpNFuX0jf3kC4ZYO11zBX+z4aDbxo4CL3EtUrvtiWbKCjcughi 31kzFgBuXyUIpkoCUsT/6eamVav7XieJ6eW2vQZZ9lFON3D2WVgUhQA2O5U9HOAbITyg Ev7Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.152.112.233 with SMTP id it9mr21840129lab.40.1343923513729; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 09:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.89.3 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 09:05:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1343593068.9245.0.camel@gwz-laptop>
References: <501531F7.5040404@gmail.com> <6.2.5.6.2.20120729073422.06d8fe10@resistor.net> <39B73AD9-4E8F-4E94-A538-69BE5D8C0E18@gmx.net> <1343593068.9245.0.camel@gwz-laptop>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 09:05:13 -0700
Message-ID: <CAL0qLwbEquWAxFGmLq+xpRApsOMURgNvsetQzpcj_BxEnBMMFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Oauth blog post
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <superuser@gmail.com>
To: Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d040838d3a4223804c64a9366"
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 16:05:15 -0000

On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Glen Zorn <glenzorn@gmail.com> wrote:

> **
>
> Do you think that corporate domination of "open" standards development is
> OK?
>
>
Do you think that's actually what we do around here?  I can think of
counterexamples if you need some.

-MSK

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status