Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board

John Levine <johnl@iecc.com> Wed, 18 February 2009 22:51 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859663A685A for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:51:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.874
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.874 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_SOI=-4.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z0JdITutf8uD for <ietf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:51:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [208.31.42.53]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1A33A6813 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:51:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 69550 invoked from network); 18 Feb 2009 22:51:42 -0000
Received: from mail1.iecc.com (208.31.42.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 18 Feb 2009 22:51:42 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=k0902; i=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=cIxEK6bMIJvIJh0Z0dLz2A8tBKu0wODb8qTBvYHdUls=; b=O42Lt/+hilLEOdq6EvDRb0FEgKqMPE51w2cBtZN8Bl1LuuWkksf71X1FuvddlY7hwfjlzQLW2eMkS2H6QoHQb2+6sXTkIMt8SiXlTHqsBB9xOQTicgAtdPEekWbxBfi/5FxJaEWsX4y6+oYLqUiJHbm3gGbaVlLDeqmFPxpgsJI=
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:51:42 -0000
Message-ID: <20090218225142.24072.qmail@simone.iecc.com>
From: John Levine <johnl@iecc.com>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Proposal to create IETF IPR Advisory Board
In-Reply-To: <877585b00902181407t5b5f3bd3u21b0ed7f9fd2b601@mail.gmail.com>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:51:31 -0000

>If the IETF chooses to ignore the FSF, I don't think that strategy will work.

It's worked for the past 20 years.  What's different now?

R's,
John