Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets

[Tobias Gondrom <[e-mail]>]

On 23/04/12 12:14, Joel jaeggli wrote:
> On 4/22/12 20:44 , Tobias Gondrom wrote:
>> Hi Russ,
>>
>> from a privacy perspective: may I ask for what purpose you propose to
>> publish the blue sheets (with the names of all WG session attendees)
>> with the proceedings?
>> AFAIK, at the moment the blue sheets are basically available on request
>> especially in case of IP questions. What would lead to the proposal to
>> publish the list of names of attendees always with the proceedings?
> The attendee list is published with the proceedings already.
I know.
>
> The blue sheets are role call and accountability for a public meeting.

I understand that. But my question would be why do we need/want to 
publish the blue sheets with the proceedings?

>> Best regards, Tobias
>>
>>
>> Ps.: btw. though I might be the only one, but I liked the blue sheet
>> replacement experiment (RFID) in Hiroshima...
>>
>>
>>
>> On 22/04/12 22:31, IETF Chair wrote:
>>> At IETF 83, we had a discussion about the future of blue sheets, many
>>> spoke at the mic in support of the proposal.  There has been very
>>> little discussion on the mail list.  However, all of the discussion
>>> that I have see has been very supportive.
>>>
>>> The suggestion is three blue sheet changes:
>>> 1.  No longer ask for email address;
>>> 2.  Scan the blue sheet and include the image in the proceedings for
>>> the WG session; and
>>> 3.  Discard paper blue sheets after scanning.
>>>
>>> Please speak up if you think this is the wrong thing to do.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>     Russ