Re: DMARC and yahoo

Doug Royer <douglasroyer@gmail.com> Tue, 15 April 2014 20:53 UTC

Return-Path: <douglasroyer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F54D1A0454 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:53:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RQz4cdjMl__j for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x229.google.com (mail-pd0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC861A01F8 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:53:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f169.google.com with SMTP id fp1so9961633pdb.28 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type; bh=6NjK7RB1Oi4UsO0Nf/yFq1pGs/CXpzcU7v/UuW9d720=; b=PN85lTU4quq1deGNA2N6fqGQFDX6xSCg+f7QzWjfVmsW9dhDsfdAonscfNBxXCIxYm v5UpG3SO32BMGXqf1tSAfqpvvBwMZTFJ684AlW3Powt5bNP7E8mM2ibTmcAf77h6hp8G uBFxeh0IeELqzOfv07Et9+I3J+EExXM0M93AJniMubnWdcXKgLJUy8qjK64Uh1pWj6Qb 9kJ0A2fYcgRxdyUnrA6W+TFwGL18T97vP7/qiN/d1NTTGf94W7nIsGxIf+PbUBjMFeCk oG6qe5eVxJJ9v7ZLXa3c/wAKYt0zPFPXTgN4s9YO7ttzdcNspJHVuHetBCszxcgH5fxS VzdA==
X-Received: by 10.68.203.39 with SMTP id kn7mr4177121pbc.141.1397595186589; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.15.4] (184-76-96-188.war.clearwire-wmx.net. [184.76.96.188]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qv9sm35384058pbc.71.2014.04.15.13.53.04 for <ietf@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Apr 2014 13:53:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <534D9C2C.8010606@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 14:53:00 -0600
From: Doug Royer <douglasroyer@gmail.com>
Organization: http://SoftwareAndServices.NET
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: DMARC and yahoo
References: <53499A5E.9020805@meetinghouse.net> <5349A261.9040500@dcrocker.net> <5349AE35.2000908@meetinghouse.net> <5349BCDA.7080701@gmail.com> <01P6L9JZF5SC00004W@mauve.mrochek.com> <CAKW6Ri5f5KZyJeL7RTG2T000Qd+t61KCofNmG2JZv+nKi94Uug@mail.gmail.com> <534C0078.3070808@meetinghouse.net> <CAKW6Ri6OUmxGaBOGR2hoWpDOGWsVQ9tQ2Q9ogkT5wzFhFJLBbQ@mail.gmail.com> <534C2262.1070507@meetinghouse.net> <CAL0qLwb5p_V3i-NGhKJZBeO0qKHm1xiAq1E3nYkBzVUAXkRPpQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKW6Ri5HWMaGMa_oLKwq5fzSUzJG=jAL1qojY1i6_tibEAxq8w@mail.gmail.com> <CAL0qLwaik1ft+AcACoc+kvKtCRt_gGvM6ov7c2yj_Uwyy3drNw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKW6Ri5_=GyOQijZMM+mqAoaEQzePGysBy9WVjN9yHO1zf3d2w@mail.gmail.com> <534C8F2B.9060903@gmail.com> <534D5516.7060902@dcrocker.net> <534D98CC.9080400@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <534D98CC.9080400@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms080107000705020602060008"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/lX06iXY0qvOTbbX_TduyQwk4pK0
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 20:53:14 -0000

Yahoo policy says you must have DKIM, SPF, or DMARC records. At what 
point could a large ISP start actually requiring these kinds of records 
for FREE email they accept and allow users to send?

Annoying, but it sounds reasonable to me for them to state a policy and 
enforce it.

If everyone had to wait until everyone upgraded, nothing would change.

-- 

Doug Royer - (K7DMR.us / DougRoyer.com)
DouglasRoyer@gmail.com
714-989-6135