IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IETF in July

Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org> Wed, 25 March 2020 15:58 UTC

Return-Path: <rsk@gsp.org>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B553A0763 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 08:58:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PgDnbifog98O for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 08:58:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from taos.firemountain.net (taos.firemountain.net [207.114.3.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5648B3A047F for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 08:58:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gsp.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by taos.firemountain.net (8.15.1/8.14.9) with SMTP id 02PFwYJv024583 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 11:58:35 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 11:58:26 -0400
From: Rich Kulawiec <rsk@gsp.org>
To: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IETF in July
Message-ID: <20200325155826.GA26053@gsp.org>
References: <DM6PR05MB63488A5D5D14D11CBF145CEBAEF50@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <c857887d-7a50-147b-5ef6-e554c90a9104@network-heretics.com> <20200325124830.GB22076@gsp.org> <VI1PR07MB5453C553FBFFF49BF54FBDBE92CE0@VI1PR07MB5453.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR07MB5453C553FBFFF49BF54FBDBE92CE0@VI1PR07MB5453.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/lZLuM76x3HKluDuevBhmSnljjhk>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 15:58:34 -0000

On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 02:52:28PM +0000, Maisonneuve, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) wrote:
> Researchers claim the immunity should last "a few months" in the absence of new stimulation of the immune system.

Which researchers?  URLs, please.

> Immunity also applies to only some aspects of the virus, mutations can make it less useful.

That's correct.  Mutations might also make it more useful, which would
be a happy accident.

As an aside, a great deal of data/analysis on COVID-19's genome
sequence is available here:

	GISAID - Global Initiative on Sharing All Influenza Data
	https://www.gisaid.org/

and here (the site uses GISAID data):

	https://nextstrain.org/ncov
	Genomic epidemiology of novel coronavirus - Nextstrain

---rsk

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email