IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Old directions in social media.

Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com> Tue, 05 January 2021 18:30 UTC

Return-Path: <moore@network-heretics.com>
X-Original-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128513A10E5 for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:30:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.18
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.18 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.262, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L24-wG3z8tEU for <ietf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:30:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 114F93A10FD for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 10:30:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248D8EC2 for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 13:30:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 05 Jan 2021 13:30:31 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=cxCvrMrVDisd7r2HmdKHV9ynDXKL5qz5RhX5fNcFA 3Y=; b=hS5a3fm6zt1B+pmCjBfq/jdR/SYbCSsNzu7wpHoaKSkyLiypWs4wCk9VE GaCyo/Zgj9zF5sLkTi/PmsD8AXEXrWM6p4cLAzd3p92ZmQwZWMzlN+/QUo5wQOIv +a+m69uMs0aU+t0gQBgF1GH9xupd8j6zYcxu5f3EH/OKHKCkbZ/72F/DfpwGNYX0 1Q+BwXHE0ePzuoSBi4vEokPnnIVNr0zpdZFSdbT17eDH5jOC6D/JCAm1UIN3XK7q QqB/TvO9DG+cNWzSjK8z8XPtl4ygM18RSwi2KYagdSZJa+Kfk9hhc93VO6vnrqVw kFhwiZr1esRFjpH35THtTB8+dMAHg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:RrD0X_vGNCBVYLpOXpUZCNjcaJCsUnpphEN_Yv5PNX8uG4g3jqNPPw> <xme:RrD0XwdXmIIelHe4swpWdym_MrR7jhZw8xYiDGXt_DUDR4wslw7RXq7uJkqca-1Ga vWgCtwAzaen6w>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrvdefjedgjeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefuvfhfhffkffgfgggjtgfgsehtje ertddtfeejnecuhfhrohhmpefmvghithhhucfoohhorhgvuceomhhoohhrvgesnhgvthif ohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekvdeggfelue elkeeuhfffheeghffhkeeuvdduudeihfehudefffdtgfdtkeffgfenucfkphepuddtkedr vddvuddrudektddrudehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrg hilhhfrhhomhepmhhoohhrvgesnhgvthifohhrkhdqhhgvrhgvthhitghsrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:RrD0Xyyw4bzv9TajlkLAY30MoKcfOuqxFj0znWlt_GhampDa22m_-Q> <xmx:RrD0X-P20gUiUk27_gqOVQExTL8UZESsRFK3D2F9yG89eGpISB4jhA> <xmx:RrD0X__UKrQ2gM6w9r2ELojRgNCQOHPabGWb3tHvkI2NuTjzC--FAw> <xmx:RrD0X9dM0atsGexa8V1Py7Nff29LgomGUG7bBsJme2Syp2CvsxmgAQ>
Received: from [192.168.1.85] (108-221-180-15.lightspeed.knvltn.sbcglobal.net [108.221.180.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5466524005E for <ietf@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Jan 2021 13:30:30 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Old directions in social media.
To: ietf@ietf.org
References: <CAMm+Lwg1-pxKU8vMinFDUbVca52VgFzTOOSJMnJjaUJvF6PLew@mail.gmail.com> <519a0e4d-7102-fac8-1517-04c590a80080@network-heretics.com> <CAJU8_nUU0Km_YtgpWbLF-JVQVUXFYvxBNBYbzaLOXBqQyvvUaA@mail.gmail.com> <062d01d6e387$39c46270$ad4d2750$@acm.org> <CAJU8_nWD3MwLs5aVNMi_3LqZysrfjv0N7N3ujV-zhqxiFh3tsA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Keith Moore <moore@network-heretics.com>
Message-ID: <788651ca-0c84-7a54-9c48-b962faed635f@network-heretics.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 13:30:29 -0500
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJU8_nWD3MwLs5aVNMi_3LqZysrfjv0N7N3ujV-zhqxiFh3tsA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/laHjHpOj1XHIxu3VmdUpijO7SY0>
X-BeenThere: ietf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF-Discussion <ietf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ietf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ietf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf>, <mailto:ietf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 18:30:33 -0000

On 1/5/21 12:46 PM, Kyle Rose wrote:

> There are still two separate last calls for all WG documents: WGLC and 
> IETF LC. Even if you never followed the issues or performed periodic 
> reviews of document revisions prior to those checkpoints, you can 
> always do it then.

Those are the LEAST effective ways of contributing to a document, the 
LEAST likely to produce an improvement, and also the most annoying ways 
of contributing that are likely in practice to create pushback and limit 
one's effectiveness in IETF overall. Yes, they're useful as last 
resorts, but the fact that they exist is not a justification for 
crippling most potential contributors.

Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email